Introduction: Electroencephalogram (EEG) is used in the neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest. "Highly malignant" EEG patterns classified according to Westhall have a high specificity for poor neurological outcome when applied within protocols of recent studies. However, their predictive performance when applied in everyday clinical practice has not been investigated. We studied the prognostic accuracy and the interrater agreement when standardized EEG patterns were analysed and compared to neurological outcome in a patient cohort at a tertiary centre not involved in the original study of the standardized EEG pattern classification.Methods: Comatose patients treated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were included. Poor outcome was defined as Cerebral Performance Category 3 À5. Two senior consultants and one resident in clinical neurophysiology, blinded to clinical data and outcome, independently reviewed their EEG registrations and categorised the pattern as "highly malignant", "malignant" or "benign". These categories were compared to neurological outcome at hospital discharge. Interrater agreement was assessed using Cohen's Kappa.Results: In total, 62 patients were included. The median (IQR) time to EEG was 59 (42À91) h after return of spontaneous circulation. Poor outcome was found in 52 (84%) patients. In 21 patients at least one of the raters considered the EEG to contain a "highly malignant" pattern, all with poor outcome (42% sensitivity, 100% specificity). The interrater agreement varied from kappa 0.62 to 0.29. Conclusion:"Highly malignant" patterns predict poor neurological outcome with a high specificity in everyday practice. However, interrater agreement may vary substantially even between experienced EEG interpreters.

Background: Electroencephalography (EEG) patterns are predictive of neurological prognosis in comatose survivors from cardiac arrest but intensive care clinicians are dependent of neurophysiologist reports to identify specific patterns. We hypothesized that the proportion of correct assessment of neurological prognosis would be higher from short statements confirming specific EEG patterns compared with descriptive plain text reports.Methods: Volunteering intensive care clinicians at two university hospitals were asked to assess the neurological prognosis of a fictional patient with high neuron specific enolase. They were presented with 17 authentic plain text reports and three short statements, confirming whether a "highly malignant", "malignant" or "benign" EEG pattern was present. Primary outcome was the proportion of clinicians who correctly identified poor neurological prognosis from reports consistent with highly malignant EEG patterns. Secondary outcomes were how the prognosis was assessed from reports consistent with malignant and benign patterns.Results: Out of 57 participants, poor prognosis was correctly identified by 61% from plain text reports and by 93% from the short statement "highly malignant" EEG patterns. Unaffected prognosis was correctly identified by 28% from plain text reports and by 40% from the short statement "malignant" patterns. Good prognosis was correctly identified by 64% from plain text reports and by 93% from the short statement "benign" pattern. Conclusion:Standardized short statement, "highly malignant EEG pattern present", as compared to plain text EEG descriptions in neurophysiologist reports, is associated with more accurate identification of poor neurological prognosis in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest.

Background Anoxic‐ischemic brain injury is the most common cause of death after cardiac arrest (CA). Robust methods to detect severe injury with a low false positive rate (FPR) for poor neurological outcome include the pupillary light reflex (PLR) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP). The PLR can be assessed manually or with automated pupillometry which provides the neurological pupil index (NPi). We aim to describe the interrelation between NPi values and the absence of SSEP cortical response and to evaluate the capacity of NPi to predict the absence of cortical SSEP response in comatose patients after CA. Methods A total of 50 patients will be included in an explorative, prospective, observational study of adult (>18 years) comatose survivors of CA admitted to intensive care in a university hospital. NPi assessed with a hand‐held pupillometer will be compared to SSEP signals recorded >48 hours after CA. Primary outcomes are sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio for NPi to predict bilateral absence of the SSEP N20 signal, with NPi values corresponding to <5% FPRs of SSEP absence. Secondary outcomes are the PLR and SSEP sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio for poor neurological outcome at hospital discharge and death at 30 days. Discussion The PLR and SSEP may have a systematic interrelation, and a certain NPi threshold could potentially predict the absence of cortical SSEP response. If this can be concluded from the present study, SSEP testing could be excluded in certain patients to save resources in the multimodal prognostication after CA. The interrelation between loss of the pupillary light reflex (PLR) and the loss of cortical response to a somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) in comatose cardiac arrest patients is not known. This exploratory prospective study is designed to evaluate whether a specific degree of attenuated PLR, as measured by semiautomated pupillometry, can predict the bilateral loss of cortical SSEP response in severe anoxic/ischemic brain injury. Such an interrelation between the two methods would enable the use of pupillometry rather than the more resource demanding SSEP for neurologic prognostication in post cardiac arrest patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04720482, Registered 21 January 2021, retrospectively registered.

No abstract