The jihadi Salafi woman is generally portrayed as excluded from the battlefield. However, studies on the issue are few, and in the Danish context non-existent. This paper therefore explores how three Danish so-called jihadi Salafi groups construct the Muslim woman’s role in defensive jihad in their online communication. The paper is based on an open-source study of social media. It finds that while some Danish jihadi Salafi uploads exclude Muslim women from combat, others construct defensive jihad as an individual obligation even for women. The paper proposes and reflects upon three conceptual types of online construction: “mother”, “martyr wife”, and “mujahida”.
This article discusses the Danish media setting and framing of Muslims and Islam exploring the role of the Danish media in the construction of the public discourse on Muslims in Denmark. The article is based on the main findings of a two-month monitoring of four Danish newspapers between mid-October and mid-December 2011. In the study we find, that a relatively large share of the items concerning Muslims and Islam are negatively framed and restricted to certain topics such as religious extremism, sharia and terror, and that the reporting is rather one-sided and exclusive of minority voices hereby contributing to a stereotypical and distorted presentation of Muslims and Islam. Therefore we argue, that the Danish media discourse contributes to the construction of a negative public discourse on Muslims and Islam, and at the same time serve to legitimize and normalize subtle racist and discriminatory attitudes towards Muslims.Danske mediers søgelys har inden for det seneste årti i stigende grad vaeret rettet mod muslimer og islam. Den Europaeiske Kommission mod Racisme og Intolerance (ECRI) har ved flere lejligheder fremhaevet de danske mediers negative fremstilling af etniske minoriteter (ECRI 1999(ECRI , 2001(ECRI , 2006, og i flere internationale studier rangerer de danske medier, som de mest kritiske over for muslimer (Word Economic Forum 2008).Imidlertid har flere af de eksisterende undersøgelser en del år på bagen, hvorfor naervaerende artikel har til formål at undersøge, hvordan muslimer og islam er fremstillet i nutidens danske mediebillede, for herefter at diskutere hvilken betydning denne fremstilling kan have for den offentlige debat omhandlende muslimer og islam i Danmark?
Radikal islamisme, jihadisme, militant Islamisme og (jihadi-)salafisme. Artiklerne i dette nummer af Tidsskrift for Islamforskning anvender forskellige termer, men er centreret omkring samme emne: En religiøs ideologi, som her går under fællesbetegnelsen ekstrem islamisme. Et emne, der de seneste år har haft stor akademisk såvel som offentlig og politisk interesse, men som ikke hidtil har været omdrejningspunkt for nærværende tidsskrift. Dette særnummer præsenterer således en række artikler, der på forskellig vis belyser skikkelser af ekstrem islamisme. Artiklerne tapper ind i flere af de mest aktuellediskussioner inden for islamforskningen og diskuterer blandt andet religionens rolle, den politiske samtid og metodologi inden for forskningsområdet.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.