The SF-36 avoids the "ceiling effect" of most disability scales and provides a valid measure of physical and mental health after stroke, but it does not appear to characterize well social functioning. Thus, the instrument may need to be supplemented by other measures for a comprehensive assessment of stroke outcome.

BackgroundTrials of fluoxetine for recovery after stroke report conflicting results. The Assessment oF FluoxetINe In sTroke recoverY (AFFINITY) trial aimed to determine if daily fluoxetine for 6 months after stroke improves functional outcome in Australasian and Vietnamese patients. MethodsAFFINITY was a randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 43 hospital stroke units in Australia (n=29), New Zealand (4), and Vietnam (10). Eligible patients were adults with a clinical diagnosis of stroke in the previous 2-15 days and a persisting neurological deficit. Patients were randomised via a web-based system using a minimisation algorithm to once daily, oral fluoxetine 20mg or matching placebo for 6 months. Patients, investigators and outcome assessors were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was functional outcome, measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS), at 6 months. The primary analysis was an ordinal logistic regression of the mRS at 6 months, adjusted for minimisation variables. Analyses were according to the patient's treatment allocation. The trial is registered with the ACTRN registry, number 12611000774921. FindingsPowered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation 1280 patients were recruited in Australia (n=532), New Zealand (n=42) and Vietnam (n=706) between 11 January 2013 and 30 June 2019; 642 were allocated fluoxetine and 638 placebo. Adherence to trial medication (mean 167 [SD 48] days) was similar between groups. At 6 months, mRS data were available in 624 (97.2%) patients allocated fluoxetine and 632 (99.1%) placebo. The distribution of mRS categories at 6 months was similar in the fluoxetine and placebo groups (adjusted common odds ratio 0.936, 95% CI 0.762-1.150; p=0.53), and consistent among all pre-defined subgroups. Compared to placebo, patients allocated fluoxetine had more falls (20 [3.12%] vs 7 [1.10%]; p=0.02), bone fractures (19 [2•96%] vs 6 [0.94%]; p=0.01) and epileptic seizures (10 [1.56%] vs 2 [0.31%]; p=0.04) at 6 months. InterpretationFluoxetine 20mg daily for 6 months after acute stroke did not improve functional outcome and increased the risk of falls, bone fractures, and seizures. These results do not support the use of fluoxetine to improve outcome after stroke.

CollaborationIMPORTANCE One in 3 adults experiences clinically significant symptoms of depression during the first year after a stroke, but evidence to support the use of antidepressants in this population remains scant.OBJECTIVE To investigate whether daily treatment with 20 mg of fluoxetine hydrochloride reduces the proportion of people affected by clinically significant symptoms of depression after stroke. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSIn this secondary analysis of the Assessment of Fluoxetine in Stroke Recovery parallel-group, randomized (1:1 assignment), double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 1221 participants in Australia, New Zealand, and Vietnam were recruited between January 11, 2013, and June 30, 2019, and were followed up for 6 months. Adults aged 18 years or older were recruited 2 to 15 days after experiencing a stroke associated with modified Rankin Scale score of 1 or higher.INTERVENTIONS Fluoxetine hydrochloride, 20 mg, or matched placebo daily for 26 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESA 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score of 9 or lower was a prespecified secondary outcome of the trial. Assessments were completed at baseline and at 4, 12, and 26 weeks. Other outcomes of interest included participant-reported clinician diagnosis of depression, prescription of a nontrial antidepressant, or nonpharmacologic treatment of depression. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis.RESULTS A total of 607 participants (378 men [62.3%]; mean [SD] age, 64.3 [12.2] years) were randomly assigned treatment with placebo, and 614 participants (397 men [64.7%]; mean [SD] age, 63.4 [12.4] years) were randomly assigned treatment with 20 mg of fluoxetine hydrochloride daily. The groups were balanced for demographic and clinical measures. At baseline, 112 patients (18.5%) in the placebo group and 116 patients (18.9%) in the fluoxetine group had PHQ-9 scores of 9 or higher. During follow-up, 126 of 596 participants (21.1%) treated with placebo and 121 of 598 participants (20.2%) treated with fluoxetine had PHQ-9 scores of 9 or higher (P = .70). A similar proportion of participants with PHQ-9 scores less than 9 at baseline who were treated with fluoxetine hydrochloride and placebo developed PHQ-9 scores of 9 or higher during the trial (placebo, 72 of 488 [14.8%]; and fluoxetine, 63 of 485 [13.0%]; P = .43). A slightly higher number of participants in the placebo group than in the fluoxetine group had a participant-reported clinician diagnosis of depression (42 of 602 [7.0%] vs 26 of 601 [4.3%]; P = .05). By week 26, 14 participants (2.3%) in the placebo group and 12 participants (1.9%) in the fluoxetine group had died (P = .67). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCERoutine daily treatment with 20 mg of fluoxetine did not decrease the proportion of people affected by clinically significant symptoms of depression after a stroke, nor did it affect the proportion of people prescribed an antidepressant or receiving nonpharmacologic treatments compared with placebo.

Background: Patients from residential aged care facilities are commonly exposed to inappropriate polypharmacy. Unplanned inpatient admissions can provide an opportunity for review of complex medical regimens and deprescribing of inappropriate or nonbeneficial medications. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety and sustainability of in-hospital deprescribing. Methods: We followed a prospective, multi-centre, cohort study design, with enrolment of 106 medical inpatients age 75 years and older (mean age was 88.8 years) who were exposed to polypharmacy prior to admission and with a planned discharge to a nursing home for permanent placement. Descriptive statistics were calculated for relevant variables. The Short Form-8 (SF-8) health survey was used to assess changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at 90-day follow up, in comparison with SF-8 results at day 30. Results: Deprescribing occurred in most, but not all patients. There were no differences between the groups in principal diagnosis, Charlson index, number of medications on admission or number of Beers list medications on admission. At 90 days, mortality and readmissions were similar, though the deprescribed group had significantly higher odds of better emotional wellbeing than the nondeprescribed group [odds ratio (OR) = 5.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.93, 13.39; p = 0.001]. In the deprescribing group, 31% of the patients still alive at 90 days had medications restarted in primary care. One-year mortality rates were similar. Conclusions: Deprescribing medications during an unplanned hospital admission was not associated with mortality, readmissions, or overall HRQOL.

No abstract