In Tijuana, Mexico, HIV is concentrated in sub-epidemics of key populations: persons who inject drugs (PWID), sex workers (SW), and men who have sex with men (MSM). To date, data on engagement in the HIV care continuum among these key populations, particularly in resource-constrained settings, are sparse. We pooled available epidemiological data from six studies (N=3,368) to examine HIV testing and treatment uptake in these key populations; finding an overall HIV prevalence of 5.7%. Of the 191 identified HIV-positive persons, only 11.5% knew their HIV-positive status and 3.7% were on ART. Observed differences between these HIV-positive key populations suggest PWID (vs. non-PWID) were least likely to have previously tested or initiate HIV care. MSM (vs. non-MSM) were more likely to have previously tested but not more likely to know their HIV-positive status. Of persons aware of their HIV-positive status, SW (vs. non-SW) were more likely to initiate HIV care. Findings suggest engagement of key populations in HIV treatment is far below estimates observed for similarly resource-constrained generalized epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa. These data provide one of the first empirical-snapshots highlighting the extent of HIV treatment disparities in key populations.

During April-August 2020, a preemptive testing strategy combined with accessible isolation and symptom screening among people experiencing homelessness in congregant living settings in San Diego contributed to a low incidence proportion of COVID-19: 0.9%. Proactively addressing challenges specific to a vulnerable population may significantly prevent spread and community outbreaks.

IntroductionMen who have sex with men (MSM) are one of the most at-risk group for contracting HIV in the USA. However, the HIV epidemic impacts some groups of MSM disproportionately. Latino MSM comprise 25.1% of new HIV infections among MSM between the ages of 13 and 29 years. The daily medication tenofovir/emtricitabine was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in 2012 and has demonstrated strong efficacy in reducing HIV acquisition.Methods and analysisThrough extensive formative research, this study uses a pilot randomised controlled trial design and will examine the feasibility and acceptability of a patient navigation intervention designed to address multiple barriers to improve engagement in the PrEP continuum among 60 Latino MSM between the ages of 18 and 29 years. The patient navigation intervention will be compared with usual care plus written information to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and study methods and the intervention’s potential in improving PrEP continuum behaviours. The results will be reviewed for preparation for a future full-scale efficacy trial.Ethics and disseminationThis study was approved by the institutional review board at San Diego State University and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The intervention development process, plan and the results of this study will be shared through peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations and healthcare system and community presentations.Registration detailsRegistered under the National Institutes of Health’s ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04048382) on 7 August 2019 and approved by the San Diego State University (HS-2017–0187) institutional review board. This study began on 5 August 2019 and is estimated to continue through 31 March 2021. The clinical trial is in the pre-results stage.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of cirrhosis, liver cancer, and mortality in the United States. We assessed the effectiveness of decentralized HCV treatment delivered by nurse practitioners (NPs), primary care physicians (PMDs), or an infectious disease physician (ID MD) using direct‐acting antivirals in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in urban San Diego, CA. We conducted a cross‐sectional analysis of 1,261 patients who received treatment from six NPs, 10 PMDs, and one ID MD practicing in 10 clinics between January 2014 and January 2020. Care was delivered based on the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (Project ECHO) model with one hub and nine spokes. HCV was deemed cured if a patient had a sustained virologic response (SVR) after 12 weeks of treatment (SVR12). We evaluated differences in the prevalence of cure between provider types and hub or spoke status using Poisson regression. Patients were 34% Latino, 16% black, 63% were aged >50 years, and 59% were homeless; 53% had advanced fibrosis, 69% had genotype 1, and 5% were coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus. A total of 943 patients achieved SVR12 (96% per protocol and 73% intention to treat). Even after adjustment for demographics, resources, and disease characteristics, the prevalence of cure did not differ between the ID MD and PMDs (prevalence ratio [PR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95‐1.04) or NPs (PR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.96‐1.05). Similarly, there were no differences between the hub and spokes (PR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.98‐1.04). Conclusion: Among a low‐income and majority homeless cohort of patients at urban FQHC clinics, HCV treatment administered by nonspecialist providers was not inferior to that provided by a specialist.