OBJECTIVES: Despite the established role of the critical care pharmacist on the ICU multiprofessional team, critical care pharmacist workloads are likely not optimized in the ICU. Medication regimen complexity (as measured by the Medication Regimen Complexity-ICU [MRC-ICU] scoring tool) has been proposed as a potential metric to optimize critical care pharmacist workload but has lacked robust external validation. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that MRC-ICU is related to both patient outcomes and pharmacist interventions in a diverse ICU population. DESIGN: This was a multicenter, observational cohort study. SETTING: Twenty-eight ICUs in the United States. PATIENTS: Adult ICU patients. INTERVENTIONS: Critical care pharmacist interventions (quantity and type) on the medication regimens of critically ill patients over a 4-week period were prospectively captured. MRC-ICU and patient outcomes (i.e., mortality and length of stay [LOS]) were recorded retrospectively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:A total of 3,908 patients at 28 centers were included. Following analysis of variance, MRC-ICU was significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.08-1.11; p < 0.01), ICU LOS (β coefficient, 0.41; 95% CI, 00.37-0.45; p < 0.01), total pharmacist interventions (β coefficient, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.04-0.09; p < 0.01), and a composite intensity score of pharmacist interventions (β coefficient, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.11-0.28; p < 0.01). In multivariable regression analysis, increased patient: pharmacist ratio (indicating more patients per clinician) was significantly associated with increased ICU LOS (β coefficient, 0.02; 0.00-0.04; p = 0.02) and reduced quantity (β coefficient, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.04 to -0.02; p < 0.01) and intensity of interventions (β coefficient, -0.05; 95% CI, -0.09 to -0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Increased medication regimen complexity, defined by the MRC-ICU, is associated with increased mortality, LOS, intervention quantity, and intervention intensity. Further, these results suggest that increased pharmacist workload is associated with decreased care provided and worsened patient outcomes, which warrants further exploration into staffing models and patient outcomes.

Purpose: A report of acute azithromycin-induced hepatocellular injury is described. Summary: An 83-year-old male was admitted with possible community-acquired pneumonia and received azithromycin and ceftriaxone. After 2 doses of azithromycin, the patient’s aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase were greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal and continued to rise with subsequent doses. A diagnostic abdominal ultrasound revealed hepatomegaly. Total bilirubin remained within normal limits during the course. Rosuvastatin and fenofibrate were held on admission and were not resumed in the setting of elevated liver enzymes. Rivaroxaban was held in the setting of worsening renal function. Hepatitis serologies were negative. Liver enzymes, international normalized ratio (INR), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) continued to climb until hospital day 5 when azithromycin was discontinued in response. Liver enzymes, INR, aPTT, and lactate dehydrogenase all decreased from hospital days 6 through 8. Conclusion: A potentially serious liver injury occurred with the initiation of azithromycin and began to resolve quickly after its discontinuation. While cholestatic injury with azithromycin is well described, this is only the third reported case of direct hepatocellular injury.

No abstract

Background: In select patients with minor ischemic stroke, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus clopidogrel is recommended if initiated early and continued for 21 to 90 days. Dual antiplatelet therapy use, in a broader population, has shown to increase the risk of bleeding without an increased antithrombotic benefit. An ongoing area of uncertainty is whether DAPT would benefit the nonminor stroke population when continued for 21 to 90 days.?s Objective: To describe the effects of DAPT after a nonminor stroke. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients initiated on antiplatelet therapy started within 1 week of symptom onset for a nonminor ischemic stroke from January 2013 to January 2020. Patients with any bleeding disorder or National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score <4 were excluded. The primary endpoint was major bleeding at 3 months. Secondary endpoints included recurrent stroke and minor bleeding. Results: A total of 158 patients met criteria for inclusion. Ninety (57%) received DAPT, and 68 (43%) received single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). The primary endpoint occurred in 3 patients in the DAPT group and 1 patient in the SAPT group ( P = 0.463). Minor bleeding occurred in 1 patient receiving DAPT and 2 patients receiving SAPT ( P = 0.402). There were 10 patients in the DAPT group and 5 patients in the SAPT group who experienced recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack ( P = 0.429). Limitations of this study include the retrospective single-center study design. Conclusion: There was a comparable risk of bleeding and recurrent stroke between DAPT and SAPT in patients admitted with an acute nonminor stroke.

For too long, our thinking has been that certain subjects belong together and that others are unrelated. We often pass this idea on to students by characterizing them as either mathematics and science or language and history learners. As a teacher, I dread the comment “I'm no good in mathematics. I'm more of an arts person.” I am frustrated when I see students pigeonhole mathematics as an independent subject when it offers so much room for interdisciplinary study.