Summary Background Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used to treat and prevent acid‐related disorders. Despite high efficacy, PPI safety has been increasingly scrutinised. However, no comprehensive review summarising investigations of various adverse events is available. Aims To perform an umbrella review to comprehensively assess associations between adverse events and PPI use. Methods In accordance with PRISMA, an umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta‐analyses was conducted. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from 2015 to July 2019. AMSTAR 2 and GRADE were used to assess quality and certainty of evidence. Author‐reported quality assessments were also reviewed. Results Forty‐two systematic reviews with meta‐analyses, supported predominantly by observational evidence, were included. The most comprehensive studies reported statistically significant associations with PPI use for several outcomes, including: fractures (eg, hip; RR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.14‐1.28; n = 2 103 800), kidney disease (eg, acute kidney injury; RR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.16‐2.22; n = 2 396 640), infections (eg, Clostridioides difficile; OR = 1.99; 95% CI = 1.73‐2.30; n = 356 683), gastric cancer (OR = 2.50; 95% CI = 1.74‐3.85; n = 943 070) and gastrointestinal events (eg, fundic gland polyps; OR = 2.46; 95% CI = 1.42‐4.27; n = 40 218). No associations with non‐gastric cancers, or neurological disease were concluded, with conflicting evidence for cardiovascular outcomes. Certainty based on GRADE was very low for most outcomes. Conclusions This review identified several published associations between PPIs and adverse outcomes, however, further investigation is needed to understand their clinical significance and the likelihood of causal relationship. If higher quality evidence is generated substantiating the potential risks, it may be necessary for clinicians to consider alternative treatment strategies, especially when PPI efficacy is suboptimal.
IMPORTANCE Programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors are immune checkpoint inhibitors widely used in the treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and other cancers. There is a lack of understanding regarding which factors are associated with therapeutic response. OBJECTIVES To conduct a systematic literature review of trials reporting on factors associated with differential response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors among patients diagnosed with metastatic ccRCC and quantitatively synthesize the magnitude to which each factor modified the response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. DATA SOURCES The MEDLINE and Cochrane Register of Trials databases were searched for studies published in English from 2006 onward. Searches were last run on September 3, 2019. STUDY SELECTION This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed 662 phase 2/3 randomized clinical trials that provided subgroup analyses of any baseline characteristics regarding the treatment response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, alone or as part of a combination therapy, with respect to overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with metastatic ccRCC. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESISA novel quantitative approach was used to synthesize subgroup findings across trials. The ratio of the subgroup-specific hazard ratios (HRs) from each study were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis whereby ratios of 1.00 would indicate that the subgroup-specific HRs were equal in magnitude. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Main outcomes were OS and PFS.RESULTS From an initial 662 reports, 7 trials were considered eligible for inclusion. Meta-analyses suggested the treatment response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with metastatic ccRCC was significantly associated with age (OS: ratio of HR for age Ն75 years to HR for age <65 years, 1.51; 95%
LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Salvo et al and Patel et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16407 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16537
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.