No abstract

The CBSST group was feasible and well accepted in the first episode programme. These preliminary findings warrant further testing in a larger trial to determine efficacy.

AimAction‐based cognitive remediation (ABCR) is a group cognitive remediation treatment that aims to improve neurocognitive impairments experienced in patients with severe mental illness. Developed in research settings, ABCR is not yet widely available in community settings. As such, this study examines the feasibility of implementing ABCR in community clinics in an early psychosis network.MethodsEighty‐five allied health professionals who work within an early psychosis intervention network were trained in the provision of ABCR. They were surveyed 6‐months after training to gather information regarding their experience implementing ABCR within their clinical settings (e.g., barriers, perceived helpfulness of the treatment, modifications made to the manualized treatment). Access to ongoing training supports (e.g., treatment manual, asynchronous digital communication, conference calls) was also assessed.ResultsFifty‐one clinicians responded to the survey. Staff time, manager support, and equipment were rated as organizational barriers. Geographic location, other responsibilities, and motivation were rated as patient barriers. Over half of the sample modified the overall dose of ABCR to offer fewer sessions and/or shorter duration of sessions than the manualized approach. Clinicians that reduced the dose of ABCR reported significantly higher barriers with manager support than staff who delivered ABCR as manualized but did not report worse patient outcomes. We found asynchronous learning opportunities (i.e., manual, online discussion forum) were perceived as the most accessible and helpful methods of ongoing training support.ConclusionsThe results provide preliminary information about barriers to implementing time‐intensive cognitive treatments into clinical settings and may inform future training practices to increase successful implementation of cognitive remediation treatments.

IntroductionWhile early psychosis intervention (EPI) has proliferated in recent years amid evidence of its effectiveness, programmes often struggle to deliver consistent, recovery-based care. NAVIGATE is a manualised model of EPI with demonstrated effectiveness consisting of four components: individualised medication management, individual resiliency training, supported employment and education and family education. We aim to implement NAVIGATE in geographically diverse EPI programmes in Ontario, Canada, evaluating implementation and its effect on fidelity to the EPI model, as well as individual-level outcomes (patient/family member-reported and interviewer-rated), system-level outcomes (captured in provincial administrative databases) and engagement of participants with lived experience.Methods and analysisThis is a multisite, non-randomised pragmatic hybrid effectiveness-implementation type III mixed methods study coordinated at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) in Toronto. Implementation is supported by the Provincial System Support Program, a CAMH-based programme with provincial offices across Ontario, and Extension of Community Healthcare Outcomes Ontario Mental Health at CAMH and the University of Toronto. The primary outcome is fidelity to the EPI model as measured using the First Episode Psychosis Services—Fidelity Scale. Four hundred participants in the EPI programmes will be recruited and followed using both individual-level assessments and health administrative data for 2 years following NAVIGATE initiation. People with lived experience will be engaged in all aspects of the project, including through youth and family advisory committees.Ethics and disseminationResearch ethics board approval has been obtained from CAMH and institutions overseeing the local EPI programmes. Study findings will be reported in scientific journal articles and shared with key stakeholders including youth, family members, programme staff and policymakers.Trial registration numberNCT03919760.

Approximately one-third of patients with early psychosis disengage from services before the end of treatment. We sought to understand patient and family perspectives on early psychosis intervention (EPI) service engagement and use these findings to elucidate factors associated with early disengagement, defined as dropout from EPI in the first 9 months. Patients aged 16–29 referred to a large EPI program between July 2018-February 2020 and their family members were invited to complete a survey exploring facilitators and barriers to service engagement. A prospective chart review was conducted for 225 patients consecutively enrolled in the same EPI program, receiving the NAVIGATE model of coordinated specialty care, between July 2018-May 2019. We conducted a survival analysis, generating Kaplan–Meier curves depicting time to disengagement and Cox proportional hazards models to determine rate of disengagement controlling for demographic, clinical, and program factors. The survey was completed by 167 patients and 79 family members. The top endorsed engagement facilitator was related to the therapeutic relationship in both patients (36.5%) and families (43.0%). The top endorsed barrier to engagement was medication side effects in both patients (28.7%) and families (39.2%). In Cox proportional hazards models, medication nonadherence (HR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.17–4.80) and use of individual psychotherapy (HR = .460, 95% CI = 0.220–0.962) were associated with early disengagement, but some of the health equity factors expected to affect engagement were not. Findings suggest that delivery of standardized treatment may buffer the effects of health disparities on service disengagement in early psychosis.