Background Thiamin, a water-soluble B-complex vitamin, functions as a coenzyme in macronutrient oxidation and in the production of cellular ATP. Data suggest that thiamin depletion occurs in heart failure (HF). Therefore, thiamin supplementation in HF patients may improve cardiac function. Objective We sought to determine whether oral thiamin supplementation improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), exercise tolerance, and quality of life among patients with HF and reduced LVEF. Methods In this prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial, eligible ambulatory patients with HF and reduced LVEF were recruited from 4 academic and community hospitals between 2010 and 2015. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 200 mg oral thiamin mononitrate per day or placebo for 6 mo. Results Sixty-nine patients (mean ± SD age: 64 ± 12 y; 83% men; LVEF: 37% ± 11%) were randomly assigned: 34 received placebo and 35 received thiamin supplementation. Erythrocyte thiamin pyrophosphate and urine thiamin concentrations were significantly higher in the supplemented group than in the placebo group at 6 mo (P = 0.02 and <0.001, respectively). At 6 mo, LVEF was significantly higher in the placebo group than in the thiamin group (38%; 95% CI: 36%, 39% compared with 35%; 95% CI: 33%, 37%, P = 0.047) after adjusting for baseline measurements. There were no significant differences in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score, distance walked in 6 min, and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide concentrations between the 2 groups. One patient (2.9%) in the thiamin-supplemented group and none in the control group died at 6 mo. Conclusions In ambulatory patients with HF and reduced LVEF, thiamin supplementation for 6 mo did not improve LVEF, quality of life, or exercise capacity, despite increases in thiamin concentrations. These findings do not support routine thiamin supplementation in the treatment of HF and reduced LVEF. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00959075.

Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) therapy has been successfully used in orthopaedic preclinical models to heal bone defects. However, no previous studies have investigated the dose-response relationship between EPC therapy and bone healing. This study aimed to assess the effect of different EPC doses on bone healing in a rat model to define an optimal dose. Five-millimeter segmental defects were created in the right femora of Fischer 344 rats, followed by stabilization with a miniplate and screws. Rats were assigned to one of six groups (control, 0.1 M, 0.5 M, 1.0 M, 2.0 M, and 4.0 M; n = 6), receiving 0, 1 × 105, 5 × 105, 1 × 106, 2 × 106, and 4 × 106 EPCs, respectively, delivered into the defect on a gelatin scaffold. Radiographs were taken every two weeks until the animals were euthanized 10 weeks after surgery. The operated femora were then evaluated using micro-computed tomography and biomechanical testing. Overall, the groups that received higher doses of EPCs (0.5 M, 1.0 M, 2.0 M, and 4.0 M) reached better outcomes. At 10 weeks, full radiographic union was observed in 67% of animals in the 0.5 M group, 83% of animals in the 1.0 M group, and 100% of the animals in the 2.0 M and 4.0 M groups, but none in the control and 0.1 M groups. The 2.0 M group also displayed the strongest biomechanical properties, which significantly improved relative to the control and 0.1 M groups. In summary, this study defined a dose-response relationship between EPC therapy and bone healing, with 2 × 106 EPCs being the optimal dose in this model. Our findings emphasize the importance of dosing considerations in the application of cell therapies aimed at tissue regeneration and will help guide future investigations and clinical translation of EPC therapy.

No abstract

Background: B vitamin deficiency has been previously reported to be prevalent in patients with heart failure. However, clinical trials investigating the potential of B vitamin supplementation have failed to show benefit and have suggested some evidence of harm. Negative findings have been hypothesized to be the result of an anti-angiogenic effect associated with B vitamin supplementation.