No abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate whether an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol was associated with a higher rate of same-day discharge after robot-assisted or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to describe the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge after these procedures. Methods A historical control, retrospective cohort study of women undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy comparing rates of same-day discharge before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol was conducted. Secondary outcomes were obtained by comparing women discharged the same day with those discharged postoperative day ≥1, including postoperative complications and unplanned postoperative patient encounters within 30 days of surgery. Logistic regression was performed to control for potential confounders. Results Of the 166 women identified (83 before ERAS implementation; 83 after ERAS implementation), 43 underwent same-day discharge versus 123 admitted overnight. The rate of same-day discharge increased 28 percentage points after ERAS implementation (12% vs 40%, P < 0.01). Compared with women admitted overnight, same-day discharge women had shorter procedures (154 vs 173 minutes, P = 0.01), spent longer time in the postanesthesia care unit (130 vs 106 minutes, P = 0.01), and were more likely to be discharged with a Foley catheter (58% vs 28%, P < 0.01). After multivariable logistic regression analysis, ERAS was associated with increased odds of same-day discharge (odds ratio, 4.91; 95% confidence interval, 2.17–11.09). There were no differences in unplanned postoperative patient contacts or postoperative complications within 30 days between same-day discharge and overnight admission groups. Conclusions Implementation of an ERAS protocol for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was associated with a 3-fold increase in same-day discharge.

No abstract

Objectives To evaluate the effect of vaginal intraoperative infiltration of liposomal bupivacaine on vaginal pain among patients undergoing posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy. Methods This was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial offered to women undergoing posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy with concomitant pelvic reconstructive procedures. Liposomal bupivacaine or normal saline placebo (30 mL) was injected into the posterior vaginal compartment and perineal body in 2- to 3-mL increments, using a systematic technique. All participants received 10-mL 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine prior to incision. Perioperative care was standardized. The primary outcome was vaginal pain as measured by a visual analog scale. Results One hundred twenty-six women were screened, and 72 were included. Demographic characteristics were similar. Median visual analog scale was not different at any time point (P = 0.81). There were no differences in secondary outcomes, including narcotic use (37.5 vs 37.5 mg morphine equivalents, P = 0.51; placebo vs liposomal bupivacaine), time to first opioid (68 vs 89.5 minutes, P = 0.56), antiemetic doses (3 vs 2, P = 0.07), hospital length of stay (24 vs 21.9 hours, P = 0.98), length of stay in postanesthesia care unit (93 vs 100 minutes, P = 0.32), proportion of patients who had a bowel movement within the first 3 postoperative days (65.7 vs 59.5% P = 0.36), or successful voiding trials (45.7 vs 59.5%, P = 0.24). There were no differences in patient satisfaction or postoperative adverse events. Conclusions In this study of pelvic reconstructive surgeries with posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy, there were no differences in pain scores or any secondary outcomes between liposomal bupivacaine and placebo injected into the posterior vaginal compartment.

This original observational study shows that doctors and midwives were poor at cutting at the prompted episiotomy angle of 60°. This highlights the need to develop structured training programmes to improve the visual accuracy of estimating angles or the use of fixed angle devices to help improve the ability to estimate the desired angle.