No abstract

Background and Objective: There is a pressing need for evidence-based interventions to address the devastating clinical and public health effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The number of registered trials related to COVID-19 is increasing by the day. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of the currently registered interventional clinical trials related to COVID-19. Methods: We searched the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform on May 15th, 2020. We included any entry that is related to COVID-19. We abstracted and then descriptively analyzed the following characteristics of the registered trials: study design, status, phase, primary endpoints, experimental interventions, and geographic location among other qualifiers. Results: We identified 1,308 eligible registered trials. Most trials were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (n 5 703; 53.7%) and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (n 5 291; 22.2%). The number of participants to be enrolled across these trials was 734,657, with a median of 110 participants per trial. The most commonly studied intervention category was pharmacologic (n 5 763; 58.3%), with antiparasitic medications being the most common subcategory. Although over half of the trials were already recruiting, we identified published peerreviewed results for only 8 of those trials. Conclusion: There is a relatively large number of registered trials but with very few results published so far. Although our findings suggest an appropriate initial response by the research community, the real challenge will be to get these trials completed, published, and translated into practice and policy.

As the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread globally, it became evident that the SARS-CoV-2 virus infects multiple organs including the brain. Several clinical studies revealed that patients with COVID-19 infection experience an array of neurological signs ranging in severity from headaches to life-threatening strokes. Although the exact mechanism by which the SARS-CoV-2 virus directly impacts the brain is not fully understood, several theories have been suggested including direct and indirect pathways induced by the virus. One possible theory is the invasion of SARS-CoV-2 to the brain occurs either through the bloodstream or via the nerve endings which is considered to be the direct route. Such findings are based on studies reporting the presence of viral material in the cerebrospinal fluid and brain cells. Nevertheless, the indirect mechanisms, including blood-clotting abnormalities and prolonged activation of the immune system, can result in further tissue and organ damages seen during the course of the disease. This overview attempts to give a thorough insight into SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus neurological infection and highlights the possible mechanisms leading to the neurological manifestations observed in infected patients.

Whipple surgery is associated with a high risk of surgical sites infections (SSIs). Nutritional deficiency has been associated with an increased risk of wound infections. This study aims at exploring the role of preoperative albumin levels in predicting the risk of SSIs following Whipple surgery. A total of 23,808 individuals were identified from the ACS-NSQIP database from years 2011 to 2017. The primary exposure was pre-operative albumin while the secondary exposure was white blood cell (WBC) count. The primary outcome was divided into superficial and deep surgical site infections (S/D SSI) and organ-space SSI. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 26. Levels of pre-operative serum albumin less than 3.73 g/L, dirty and contaminated wounds and longer operative time were associated with increased odds for developing S/D SSIs (OR = 1.14, OR = 1.17, OR = 1.06, respectively, p-value < 0.05). Pre-operative WBC level (/L) was associated with a risk of developing an organ-space SSI but not S/D SSI (OR = 1.02, p-value  0.003). This study demonstrates the predictive role of pre-operative albumin in developing S/D SSIs and highlights the need to develop therapeutic strategies to optimize the pre-operative nutritional health status of patients undergoing Whipple surgery.

BACKGROUND:Blasts incidents impose catastrophic aftermaths on populations regarding casualties, sustained injuries, and devastated infrastructure. Lebanon witnessed one of the largest nonnuclear chemical explosions in modern history-the August 2020 Beirut Port blast. This study assesses the mechanisms and characteristics of blast morbidity and mortality and examines severe injury predictors through the Injury Severity Score. METHODS:A retrospective, multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted. Data of trauma patients presenting to five major acute-care hospitals in metropolitan Beirut up to 4 days following the blast were collected in a two-stage process from patient hospital chart review and follow-up phone calls. RESULTS:A total of 791 patients with a mean age of 42 years were included. The mean distance from the blast was 2.4 km (SD, 1.9 km); 3.1% of victims were in the Beirut Port itself. The predominant mechanism of injury was being struck by an object (falling/projectile) (293 [37.0%]), and the most frequent site of injury was the head/face (209 [26.4%]). Injury severity was low for 548 patients (71.2%), moderate for 62 (8.1%), and severe/critical for 27 (3.5%). Twenty-one deaths (2.7%) were recorded. Significant serious injury predictors (Injury Severity Score, >15) were sustaining multiple injuries (odds ratio [OR], 2.62; p = 0.005); a fracture (OR, 5.78; p < 0.001); primary blast injuries, specifically a blast lung (OR, 18.82; p = 0.001), concussion (OR, 7.17; p < 0.001), and eye injury (OR, 8.51; p < 0.001); and secondary blast injuries, particularly penetrating injuries (OR, 9.93; p < 0.001) and traumatic amputations (OR, 13.49; p = 0.01). Twenty-five percent were admitted to the hospital, with 4.6% requiring the intensive care unit. At discharge, 25 patients (3.4%) had recorded neurologic disability. CONCLUSION:Most injuries sustained by the blast victims were minor. Serious injuries were mostly linked to blast overpressure and projectile fragments. Understanding blast injuries characteristics, their severity, and management is vital to informing emergency services, disaster management strategies, hospital preparedness, and, consequently, improving patient outcomes.