Background The number of cancer survivors is increasing rapidly; however, little is known about whether engaging in physical activity after a cancer diagnosis is associated with lower mortality rates in men. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of 1,021 men (mean age, 71.3 years) who were diagnosed with cancer (other than non-melanoma skin cancer). Men reported their physical activities (walking, stair climbing, and participation in sports and recreational activities) on questionnaires in 1988, a median of 6 years after their cancer diagnosis. Physical activity was updated in 1993 and men were followed until 2008, with mortality follow-up >99% complete, during which 777 men died (337 from cancer, 190 from cardiovascular disease). Results In multivariate analyses, the relative risks for all-cause mortality associated with expending <2100, 2100–4199, 4200–8399, 8400–12,599, and ≥12,600 kJ/week in physical activity were 1.00 (referent), 0.77, 0.74, 0.76, and 0.52, respectively; p, trend <0.0001. Higher levels of physical activity also were associated with lower rates of death from cancer and cardiovascular disease; p, trend = 0.01 and 0.002, respectively. Conclusions Engaging in physical activity after cancer diagnosis is associated with better survival among men.
Early infant-parent interaction sets a critical foundation for young children's well-being, and evidence regarding the protective role of secure early relationships has led to increased interest in effective screening and promotion of early relational health in pediatric primary care and home visiting settings. We report findings from two pilot studies conducted in the United States that describe the reliability and validity of a relational health screening tool, the Early Relational Health Screen (ERHS), implemented in two different contexts: an innovative model of relational health promotion in pediatric primary care (Study 1) and an Infant Mental Health Home Visiting (IMH-HV) model (Study 2). Across both studies, a trained clinician rated the ERHS following real-time observation of interaction (i.e., "in-the-moment" ratings). Reliability was assessed by comparing "in-the-moment" ERHS ratings to subsequent coding of the same interaction from video by an independent evaluator. In addition, Study 2 data permitted evaluation of the validity of "in-the-moment" ERHS ratings. Results from both studies indicated reliability of "in-the-moment" ERHS ratings. In addition, Study 2 clinician "in-the-moment" ratings were associated with maternal depression and ratings of child-parent interaction derived from a separate observational task coded by independent evaluators using a different well-validated research-based measure. Discussion highlights the potential of the ERHS as a screening, promotion, and prevention tool that may be feasibly administered by providers across pediatric primary care and home visiting settings.
:Objective:The goal of this study was to test the impact of maternal adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on subsequent child language competence; higher parental ACEs were expected to predict risk of toddler language delay. Participation in Infant Mental Health Home Visiting (IMH-HV) treatment, which aims to enhance responsive caregiving and improve child social-emotional development, was expected to mitigate this association.Methods:A randomized controlled trial (RCT) design was used. ACEs data were collected at baseline. Child language screening (using the Preschool Language Scales Screening Test) was conducted 12 months later by masters-level evaluators who were blind to treatment condition. Visits occurred in participants' homes. Participants were community-recruited and were randomized to treatment (psychotherapeutic IMH-HV) or control (treatment as usual). Data come from 62 families who participated in all waves of an RCT testing the efficacy of IMH-HV; mothers were eligible based on child age (<24 mo at enrollment) and endorsement of ≥2 sociodemographic eligibility criteria (economic disadvantage, depression, perceived parenting challenges, and/or high ACEs).Results:The age of mothers enrolled in this ranged from 19 to 44 years (M = 31.91; SD = 5.68); child age at baseline ranged from prenatal to 26 months (M = 12.06; SD = 6.62). The maternal ACE score predicted child language competence (t (5,55) = −3.27, p = 0.002). This effect was moderated by treatment (t (6,54) = 1.73, p = 0.04), indicating no association between maternal ACEs and child language for those randomized to IMH-HV.Conclusion:The results highlight that the effects of parent ACEs on early childhood outcomes may be buffered by participation in psychotherapeutic home visiting (trial registration: NCT03175796).
Little work has examined longitudinal associations between parental reflective functioning (PRF) and mind-mindedness (MM), limiting the understanding of separate or bidirectional trajectories of these related but distinct forms of mentalization. We examined cross-lagged associations between PRF, assessed via interview, and MM, coded from play interactions, over 12 months among 90 parents (86% female; 57% White, 43% Black) of infants (Mage = 10.56 months, SD = 8.20) who were participating in The Michigan Model of Infant Mental Health Home Visiting. Data were collected at study enrollment Time 1 (T1) and at 6-month Time 2 (T2) and 12-month Time 3 (T3) postenrollment. Mind-minded comments were coded as appropriate, reflecting accurate interpretation of mental states or nonattuned, characterizing inaccurate interpretations. PRF and appropriate MM each remained stable over time. PRF at the T1 positively predicted appropriate MM at T2. No other cross-lagged associations between PRF and appropriate MM were significant. Concurrent correlations between appropriate MM and PRF were significant only at T3. Nonattuned MM showed stability from T1 to T2 but nonattuned MM at the T2 did not predict nonattuned MM at T3. Greater PRF at T1 predicted less nonattuned MM at T2. No other cross-lagged associations between PRF and nonattuned MM were significant.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.