Introduction : Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is a chronic, multisystemic, neurological condition. Patients and caregivers are uniquely suited to identify what symptoms are most important and highlight the unmet needs that are most relevant to DM. Methods : We conducted a North American, cross‐sectional study of people with DM type‐1, congenital DM, and DM type‐2 and their family members. We sent patients and caregivers separate surveys to identify and quantitate the issues of greatest importance, examine the differences between groups, and identify the most important challenges experienced by this population. Results : 1,180 people with DM and 402 family members/caregivers responded to the surveys. They reported considerable physical and cognitive symptoms, extensive diagnostic delays, and varying clinical phenotypes on the basis of DM type. Discussion : Marked disease burden and numerous unmet needs exist in DM. These needs vary based on DM type and highlight the complex clinical phenotypes of these neurological disorders. Muscle Nerve 59:457–464, 2019

Background Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is a rare, inherited disorder with multi-systemic effects that impact the skeletal muscles, eyes, heart, skin and gastrointestinal, endocrine, respiratory, and central nervous systems. DM is divided into two subtypes: DM1 can present from early childhood through adulthood and also has a congenital form (cDM) while DM2 typically manifests during mid-adulthood. Both forms are progressive with no approved treatments, and unmet need for disease-modifying therapies remains high. This study interrogated health insurance claims data to explore the clinical experience, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and all-cause costs for DM. Results A total of 8541 patients with DM and 242 patients with cDM and their matched controls were selected from a database of over 200 million claimants. HCRU and all-cause costs, including pharmacy, outpatient, and inpatient services, were analyzed across four years in 12-month follow-up periods. Mean all-cause costs per DM patient were high in each of the four periods (range $14,640–$16,704) and showed a steady increase from 13 to 23 months on, while the control group mean costs declined from $9671 in the first 12 months after the index event, to approach the US population average ($5193) over time. For cDM, the highest mean costs were in the first 12-months ($66,496 vs. $2818 for controls), and remained high (above $17,944) across all subsequent periods, while control mean costs approached $0. For DM and cDM, HCRU was higher compared to controls across all study periods and all-cause healthcare costs were mostly driven by inpatient and outpatient encounters. Analysis of all diagnosis codes over the study period (comorbidities) demonstrated an elevated comorbidity profile consistent with the clinical profile of DM. Conclusions This study is among the first to utilize claims data to increase understanding of the clinical experience and health economic outcomes associated with DM. The markedly elevated HCRU patterns and comorbidity profile presented here add to the broad body of scientific and clinical knowledge on DM. These insights can inform clinical care and support the development of disease modifying and/or symptom-targeting therapies that address the multi-systemic, progressive nature of DM.

No abstract