Approximately 60% to 90% of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) show nonsuicidal self-injurious behavior (NSSI) with cutting being the most frequently applied method. One of NSSI's functions is to reduce aversive tension. Previous studies have found a tension-reducing effect of painful tissue injury by an incision. It is still unclear whether this effect is based on the effect of tissue injury or the effect of pain experience, or both. The aim of this study was to determine whether tissue injury leads to a stronger stress reduction than a sole pain stimulus in patients with BPD. After stress induction, 57 BPD patients and 60 healthy controls (HCs) received either an incision or a non-tissue-injuring mechanical nociceptive stimulus ("blade") typically perceived as painful or a non-nociceptive tactile sham stimulus (blunt end of scalpel). Participants were unaware of which procedure was applied. For stress assessment, subjective and objective parameters were measured. As immediate response to the stimulus application, we found greater stress reduction after both painful stimuli (incision and blade) in BPD patients but no difference in stress decrease between the tissue-injuring incision and the non-tissue-injuring pain stimulus (blade). Compared with HCs, incision and blade were followed by greater immediate decrease of arousal in BPD patients. Our findings confirm that among BPD patients, the nociceptive input leads to stress reduction. In contrast, the impact of tissue damage on stress reduction was relatively small. In addition, the results suggest that painful stimuli lead to a greater stress reduction in BPD patients compared with HCs.

No abstract

Background Cutting is the most common method of non‐suicidal self‐injury (NSSI) to reduce inner tension in patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). Aim of this study was to compare pain perception induced by an incision and by application of a surrogate model for sharp mechanical pain (a non‐invasive “blade”) in BPD. Methods 22 female patients and 20 healthy controls (HC) received a small incision into the volar forearm, a 7s‐blade application on the same side, and non‐invasive phasic stimuli (pinprick, blade, laser, tactile). Pain intensity as well as affective versus sensory components were assessed. Results Incision was rated similarly by both groups (BPD: 28.6 ± 5.5 vs. HC: 33.9 ± 6.6; mean maximum pain ± SEM; p > 0.8), without significant difference for “7‐s‐blade” (BPD: 18.1 ± 3.8 vs. HC: 25.3 ± 3.6; mean maximum pain ± SEM; p > 0.17) or between “7‐s‐blade” and incision (BPD: p > 0.12; HC: p > 0.84). However, patients’ intensity ratings returned significantly faster to baseline after incision (BPD: 38.9 ± 12.6 s vs. HC: 74.52 ± 11.5 s; p < 0.05), and patients evaluated “blade” and incision without any affective and with different sensory descriptors, indicating an altered evaluation of NSSI‐like stimulation with qualitative in addition to quantitative differences—especially for the sharp pain component. Conclusions The reduced perception of suprathreshold nociceptive stimuli is based on a missing affective component and specific loss of the perception of “sharpness” as part of the sensory component of pain. The results further demonstrate the usefulness of the “blade” for the perception of sharpness in patients. Significance Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) who engage in non‐suicidal self‐injury (NSSI) report less pain in response to phasic nociceptive stimuli. In comparing an invasive pain stimulus to phasic nociceptive stimuli in BPD patients, the “blade” as non‐invasive surrogate model for sharp mechanical pain in psychiatric patients is used. In contrast to healthy volunteers, BPD patients do not report significant affective ratings and specifically display a reduced sensory component for sharpness.