Purpose: OnJune 28, 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved dasatinib (Sprycel; Bristol-Myers Squibb), a new small-molecule inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases, for the treatment of adults with chronic phase, accelerated phase, or myeloid or lymphoid blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome^positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL) with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy including imatinib.This summary reviews the database supporting this approval. Experimental Design: Four single-arm multicenter studies supported the efficacy and safety of dasatinib. The primary efficacy end point in chronic phase CML was major cytogenetic response. The primary end point in accelerated phase, myeloid phase, and lymphoid blast phase CML, and Ph + ALL was major hematologic response. Results: The four studies combined enrolled 445 patients. In patients with chronic phase CML, the major cytogenetic response rate was 45% with a complete cytogenetic response rate of 33%. Major hematologic response rates in patients with accelerated phase CML, myeloid CML, lymphoid blast CML, and Ph + ALL were 59%, 32%, 31%, and 42%, respectively. Median response durations in chronic phase, accelerated phase, and myeloid phase CML had not been reached.The median durations of major hematologic response were 3.7 months in lymphoid blast CML and 4.8 months in Ph + ALL. Common toxicities with dasatinib included myelosuppression, bleeding, and fluid retention. Conclusions: This report describes the Food and Drug Administration review supporting the approval of dasatinib for CML and Ph + ALL based on the rates and durability of cytogenetic and hematologic responses.

Purpose: To discuss vorinostat approval for treatment of cutaneous manifestations of advanced cutaneousT-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Experimental Design: Data from 1single-arm, open-label, multicenter pivotal trial and 11other trials submitted to support the new drug application for vorinostat in the treatment of advanced primary CTCL were reviewed. The pivotal trial assessed responses by changes in overall skin disease score using a severity-weighted assessment tool (SWAT). Vorinostat could be considered active in CTCL if observed response rate was at least 20 % and the lower bound of the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) excluded 5%. Patients reported pruritis relief using a questionnaire and a visual analogue scale. Results: The pivotal trial enrolled 74 patients with stage IB or higher CTCL. Median number of prior treatments was 3, and 61patients (82%) had stage IIB or higher disease. The objective response rate in the skin disease assessed by change in the overall SWAT score from the baseline was 30% (95% CI, 18.5 to 42.6) in patients with stage IIB or higher disease. Median response duration (end of response defined by 50% increase in SWATscore from the nadir) was 168 days. Median time to tumor progression was 148 days for overall population and 169 days for patients with stage IIB or higher disease. Assessment of pruritis relief was considered unreliable. Conclusions: Vorinostat showed activity in CTCL, and skin responses were a clinical benefit. Vorinostat was approved for treatment of cutaneous manifestations of CTCL. A nonblinded, single-arm trial did not allow a reliable assessment of pruritis relief.

Purpose: To describe the considerations leading to marketing approval of ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine and as monotherapy for the treatment of advanced breast cancer that is refractory to other chemotherapies. Experimental Design: Data from one randomized multicenter trial comparing combination therapy with ixabepilone and capecitabine to capecitabine alone were analyzed for support of the combination therapy indication. For monotherapy, a single-arm trial of ixabepilone was analyzed. Supporting data came from an additional single-arm combination therapy study and two singlearm monotherapy studies. Results: In patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer who had disease progression on or following an anthracycline and a taxane, ixabepilone plus capecitabine showed an improvement in progression-free survival compared with capecitabine alone {median progression-free survival, 5.7 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 4.8-6.7] versus 4.1 (95% CI, 3.1-4.3) months, stratified log-rank P < 0.0001; hazard ratio, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.58-0.83)}. As monotherapy for patients who had disease progression on or following an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine, ixabepilone as monotherapy showed a 12% objective response rate by independent blinded review and 18% by investigator assessment.The major toxicities from ixabepilone therapy were peripheral neuropathy and myelosuppression, particularly neutropenia. Conclusions: On October 16, 2007, the Food and Drug Administration approved ixabepilone for injection in combination with capecitabine or as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer who have experienced disease progression on previous chemotherapies.

This study is a retrospective review of 60 patients who had microvascular free flap reconstructions in the head and neck region. They were all performed over a 10-year period by a single surgeon. The series includes a wide range of flap types and analyses pre-operative risk factors for flap failure as well as complications and outcome. Smoking and advanced age did not appear to prejudice flap survival but peripheral vascular disease, cardiac disease and alcohol withdrawal were found to increase the likelihood of flap failure. The most frequent complications encountered were thrombosis of one of the anastomosis and haematoma. The most successful flap in terms of survival and function was the fasciocutaneous radial forearm flap. The literature is reviewed in relation to the general principles of microvascular free flap surgery and the results of this series are placed in context.