Objective: Although there is mounting evidence that massed treatment for PTSD is both feasible and effective, many questions remain about the optimal length of intensive treatment programs (ITPs), as well as the role of adjunctive services, such as psychoeducation, mindfulness, and yoga. Our setting recently transitioned from a three-week ITP to a two-week program. Adjunctive services were reduced, but the amount of individual CPT between programs remained similar. The present study examined the effectiveness of a two-week ITP based on twice daily individual CPT sessions and evaluated the program's noninferiority to an established three-week ITP using a Bayesian analytical approach. Method: Bayesian linear mixed regression models were used to explore PTSD and depression changes over time, as well as predictors of change. Noninferiority of the two-week ITP to a three-week ITP was also established using a Bayes factor approach. Results: Results indicate that program participants change meaningfully in both PTSD and depression severity over the course of treatment, and that changes in posttraumatic cognitions predict subsequent changes in these outcomes. Further, the two-week ITP can be considered noninferior to the three-week ITP in both clinical outcomes and overall satisfaction. Conclusions: In the context of intensive PTSD treatment, the content of the ITP appears to matter more than its overall length. Shorter programs have the potential to increase access and treatment capacity. Our findings demonstrate the importance of continuous and rigorous program evaluation. Limitations as well as future directions for research, such as identifying the most effective treatment components, are discussed. Clinical Impact StatementThe present study compared 2 intensive treatment programs for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The 2-and 3-week-long programs were based on daily Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) as well as adjunctive services. The two-week program had fewer overall service hours but offered a comparable amount of CPT. Both programs produced large and equivalent PTSD and depression severity reductions. The findings suggest that the more/longer treatment is not necessarily better and that content of the intensive PTSD treatment programs appears to matter more than its overall length. Shorter PTSD treatment programs have the potential to increase access and capacity.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments are increasingly delivered in massed formats and have shown comparable results to standard, weekly treatment. To date, massed cognitive processing therapy (CPT), delivered daily, has been delivered primarily in combination with adjunctive services and among veteran populations, but it has not been rigorously evaluated as a standalone intervention. The present study evaluated 1‐week massed CPT delivered virtually (i.e., via telehealth) to a community sample of trauma‐exposed individuals (N = 24). Using a single‐arm open‐label design, participants received CPT twice per day for 5 days. The results indicated that most participants completed treatment (n = 23, 95.8%), and no adverse events were reported. Participants exhibited large reductions in clinician‐rated, d = 2.01, and self‐reported PTSD symptoms, d = 2.55, as well as self‐reported depressive symptoms, d = 1.46. On average, participants reported a 5‐point PTSD symptom reduction and 1‐point reduction in depressive symptoms for each treatment day. Reductions in PTSD and depressive symptoms were maintained at 3‐month follow‐up. Overall, 1‐week massed CPT delivered virtually was shown to be feasible and to result in rapid symptom reductions that were sustained over time. Virtual massed CPT has the potential to increase access to effective treatments and help trauma survivors restore aspects of their lives in short amounts of time.

No abstract

Objective: Evidence-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can be effectively delivered over telehealth. There are, however, no studies that examine the effectiveness of delivering evidence-based treatments for PTSD in an intensive format via telehealth. Telehealth may be well-suited as a delivery modality because it may address barriers specific to intensive treatments. Method: To address this gap, we report on a case series of ten consecutively enrolled veterans (60% male; mean age 42.3, SD = 6.3) who participated in a virtual 2-week, cognitive processing therapy (CPT)-based intensive program. Results: All (100%) participants completed treatment and reported large reductions in PTSD and depression symptoms pre- to posttreatment (Hedge’s gws = 2.83 and gws = 1.97, respectively), pre- to 3-month follow-up (Hedge’s gws = .99 and gws = 1.24, respectively), as well as very high satisfaction. Conclusions: Results of this case series suggest that evidence-based treatments for PTSD can be effectively delivered in intensive formats over telehealth and lay the foundation for more rigorously designed and larger scale research comparing virtual to in-person delivered intensive PTSD treatments.

This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.