During the COVID-19 pandemic, several hospitals implemented “birthing alone” policies, banning companions (e.g., partners, family members, doulas) from accompanying individuals giving birth. We offer an ethical analysis of these policies. First, we examine them through a consequentialist framework of risks and benefits. Second, we consider the significance of birth, highlighting the unique ways in which risks, relationships, and rights are understood in the context of obstetrics. We conclude that birthing alone policies are largely unjustified, as the harm they are certain to cause outweighs their possible benefits and because they fail to take into account what matters to mothers.
I. Historical Review………………………………………………………. p. a. The invention of the speculum: Lucy, Anarcha, and Betsey…… p. b. Sex workers, 'models,' and marginalized groups………………. p. c. The introduction of the anesthetized PE………………………... p. d. 'Our bodies, ourselves:' Gynaecological teaching associates…... p. II. Contemporary Review…………………………………………………. p. a. Patients' experiences of the PE…………………………………. p. b. Medical student perspectives on the PE……………………….... p. c. Medical school culture and #MeTooPelvic……………………... p. d. Medical education curricula…………………………………….. p. e. Screening guidelines and DIY cervical swabs………………….. p. f. Patient-centred improvements…………………………………... p.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.