Invasive species are a threat to biodiversity and can cause ecological degradation, however, well-established invasive species may serve valuable ecological functions. For example, in the Laurentian Great Lakes, where nutrient pollution is a major issue, highly productive Phragmites australis (European Common Reed) may provide a nutrient retention service. Yet there is a lack of research comparing carbon and macronutrient stocks in P. australis with resident plant communities, such as cattail and meadow marsh. We quantified the effect of P. australis invasion on carbon and macronutrient standing stocks in a freshwater coastal marsh by comparing the above-and belowground biomass, tissue nutrient concentrations, and annual nutrient standing stocks in marsh invaded by P. australis with cattail marsh (dominated by Typha spp.) and meadow marsh (dominated by Calamagrostis canadensis), which are being displaced by P. australis in Lake Erie coastal marsh. We conclude that the effect of P. australis invasion on carbon and macronutrient standing stocks is dependent on the plant community being replaced. The annual standing stock of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium are consistent between cattail marsh and P. australis-invaded marsh, though cattail marsh contains more magnesium (112% mean increase) and calcium (364% mean increase). In contrast, when P. australis replaces meadow marsh, the standing stocks of all measured nutrients and carbon increase significantly (103-188% mean increase). Our study highlights that plant invasions may create trade-offs between ecosystem services. In our case, the increase in nutrient standing stocks when P. australis invades meadow marsh should be weighed against the documented reductions in biodiversity and habitat value.
Invasive European Reed (Phragmites australis subsp. australis) outcompetes native vegetation, reducing floristic diversity and habitat value for wildlife. Research in coastal salt marshes has indicated that P. australis invasion may be facilitated by its relatively deep rooting depth, but in freshwater marshes the growth pattern of below ground tissues in relation to water depth is uncertain. To determine if P. australis is rooting more deeply than resident wetland plant species in a freshwater coastal marsh on Lake Erie, Ontario, we measured the vertical distribution of below ground biomass in P. australis invaded marsh sites and compared it to the below ground biomass distribution in nearby sites not yet invaded by P. australis. These invaded and uninvaded sites were paired by water depth, which is known to influence resource allocation and rooting depth. Below ground biomass in invaded sites was greater than in uninvaded sites (t28 = 3.528, P = 0.001), but rooting depth (i.e., the depth at which 90% of total below ground biomass is accounted for) was comparable (t28 = 0.992, P = 0.330). Using water depth and site type, general linear models could predict below ground biomass (F2,55 = 9.115, P < 0.001) but not rooting depth (F2,55 = 1.175, P = 0.316). Rooting depth is likely affected by other factors such as substrate type and the depth of the organic soil horizon.
Wetlands are important global carbon sinks, an increasingly important ecosystem service. Invasive plants can disrupt wetland carbon budgets, although efforts to suppress invasive plants may also have unintended effects. Invasive Phragmites australis subsp. australis (European common reed) produces extensive monocultures that displace resident plant communities. In Long Point (Ontario, Canada), a glyphosate-based herbicide was used to control over 900 ha of P. australis. We determined how this ongoing management, and different environmental conditions, influence net primary productivity and decomposition rates. We compared above- and below-ground biomass, belowground:aboveground biomass ratios, standing dead stems, and litter in un-treated P. australis stands, in herbicide-treated areas, and in reference vegetation. We also conducted a reciprocal transplant experiment to measure the decomposition rates of plant litter. One-year post-treatment, control efforts dramatically reduced aboveground biomass (122 g/m2 ± 133 SD) compared to un-treated P. australis (1254 g/m2 ± 449 SD) and reference habitat (821 g/m2 ± 335 SD). An interaction between the plant community of the site and water depth predicted litter decomposition rates, with litter loss ranging from 5.75 to 74.65% across all species, and submerged litter decomposing faster. These results emphasize that secondary treatment, such as rolling, burning, or cutting, encourages the decomposition of dead P. australis stems, opening up space for the recovery of native plants. While herbicide-treated sites had low biomass immediately following treatment, aquatic vegetation began rapidly colonizing treated areas, suggesting that plant community recovery may restore the wetland carbon uptake in subsequent years.
Ecologists are increasingly encouraged by funding agencies and professional societies to communicate their research with the public. However, most receive relatively little training in how to do this effectively. Furthermore, evaluation of whether such an investment by ecologists actually achieves conservation objectives is rare. We created an education program, involving print, television, radio, and internet media, to increase awareness about earthworm invasions and to discourage anglers from dumping earthworm bait. Using pre-and post-surveys, we evaluated our program's success in reaching its target audience and in changing knowledge and behavior. Few participants (4.1%) recalled seeing the program material and knowledge of the fact that earthworms are non-native in Alberta remained low (15.8% before, 15.1% after). Further, after being told about the negative effects of earthworms in forests, 46.7% of the anglers surveyed stated they would not change their bait disposal behavior in the future, with many commenting that they did not believe earthworms could be harmful. These results highlight the importance of evaluating education programs, rather than assuming they are successful. Given many participants' doubts that earthworms have negative effects, both regulations and education may be needed to reduce earthworm introductions.
Wetland carbon budgets largely depend on the wetland communities’ relative rate of carbon assimilation and carbon emission. Invasive plants with growth or decomposition patterns that differ from reference plant communities may shift wetland carbon budgets, as may invasive plant suppression efforts. For example, Phragmites australis (European Common Reed), which replaces meadow and cattail marsh in the Laurentian Great Lakes area, has high biomass production and foliar nitrogen, can modify the environment conditions that effect decomposition rates, creates thick stands of slowly decomposing standing dead stems, and is often controlled using broad-spectrum herbicides. Our objectives were to determine if P. australis control efforts in freshwater coastal marshes were sufficient to return net primary productivity, decomposition rates, and environmental conditions to within their pre-invasion range. We find that P. australis invasion had the greatest effect on carbon sequestration when replacing meadow marsh, as opposed to cattail marsh. We conclude that control efforts, one-year post-treatment, dramatically reduce total biomass and carbon assimilation compared to meadow and cattail marsh. However, floating and submersed aquatic vegetation rapidly colonized treated areas, suggesting that continuing plant community recovery may restore the carbon budget in subsequent years.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.