No abstract

Background Brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is expressed in neuronal and nonneuronal cells and may affect vascular functions via its receptor, tropomyosin‐related kinase B (TrkB). In this study, we determined the expression of BDNF in different perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) depots of patients with established coronary atherosclerosis. Methods and Results Serum, vascular tissue, and PVAT surrounding the proximal aorta (C‐PVAT) or internal mammary artery (IMA‐PVAT) was obtained from 24 patients (79% men; mean age, 71.7±9.7 years; median body mass index, 27.4±4.8 kg/m 2 ) with coronary atherosclerosis undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery. BDNF protein levels were significantly higher in C‐PVAT compared with IMA‐PVAT, independent of obesity, metabolic syndrome, or systemic biomarkers of inflammation. mRNA transcripts of TrkB, the BDNF receptor, were significantly reduced in aorta compared with IMA. Vessel wall TrkB immunosignals colocalized with cells expressing smooth muscle cell markers, and confocal microscopy and flow cytometry confirmed BDNF receptor expression in human aortic smooth muscle cells. Significantly elevated levels of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B, a negative regulator of TrkB signaling in the brain, were also observed in C‐PVAT. In vitro, inhibition of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B blunted the effects of BDNF on smooth muscle cell proliferation, migration, differentiation, and collagen production, possibly by upregulation of low‐affinity p75 neurotrophin receptors. Expression of nerve growth factor or its receptor tropomyosin‐related kinase A did not differ between C‐PVAT and IMA‐PVAT. Conclusions Elevated expression of BDNF in parallel with local upregulation of negative regulators of neurotrophin signaling in perivascular fat and lower TrkB expression suggest that vascular BDNF signaling is reduced or lost in patients with coronary atherosclerosis.

No abstract

Background As immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are increasingly being used due to effectiveness in various tumor entities, rare side effects occur more frequently. Pericardial effusion has been reported in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after or under treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, knowledge about serositis and edemas induced by checkpoint inhibitors in other tumor entities is scarce. Methods and results Four cases with sudden onset of checkpoint inhibitor induced serositis (irSerositis) are presented including one patient with metastatic cervical cancer, two with metastatic melanoma and one with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In all cases treatment with steroids was successful in the beginning, but did not lead to complete recovery of the patients. All patients required multiple punctures. Three of the patients presented with additional peripheral edema; in one patient only the lower extremities were affected, whereas the entire body, even face and eyelids were involved in the other patients. In all patients serositis was accompanied by other immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Conclusion ICI-induced serositis and effusions are complex to diagnose and treat and might be underdiagnosed. For differentiation from malignant serositis pathology of the punctured fluid can be helpful (lymphocytes vs. malignant cells). Identifying irSerositis as early as possible is essential since steroids can improve symptoms.

No abstract