Immunogenicity following inactivated SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination among solid organ transplant recipients has not been assessed. Seventy‐five patients (37 kidney transplant [KT] recipients and 38 healthy controls) received two doses, at 4‐week intervals, of an inactivated whole‐virus SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine. SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific humoral (HMI) and cell‐mediated immunity (CMI) were measured before, 4 weeks post‐first dose, and 2 weeks post‐second dose. The median (IQR) age of KT recipients was 50 (42–54) years and 89% were receiving calcineurin inhibitors/mycophenolate/corticosteroid regimens. The median (IQR) time since transplant was 4.5 (2–9.5) years. Among 35 KT patients, the median (IQR) of anti‐RBD IgG level measured by CLIA after vaccination was not different from baseline, but was significantly lower than in controls (2.4 [1.1–3.7] vs. 1742.0 [747.7–3783.0] AU/ml, p < .01) as well as percentages of neutralizing antibody inhibition measured by surrogate viral neutralization test (0 [0–0] vs. 71.2 [56.8–92.2]%, p < .01). However, the median (IQR) of SARS‐CoV‐2 mixed peptides‐specific T cell responses measured by ELISpot was significantly increased compared with baseline (30 [4–120] vs. 12 [0–56] T cells/10 6 PBMCs, p = .02) and not different from the controls. Our findings revealed weak HMI but comparable CMI responses in fully vaccinated KT recipients receiving inactivated SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination compared to immunocompetent individuals (Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20210226002).

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Vascular calcification (VC) is common among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The severity of VC is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. Risk factors for VC include traditional cardiovascular risk factors as well as CKD-related risk factors such as increased calcium and phosphate load. VC is observed in arteries of all sizes from small arterioles to aorta, both in the intima and the media of arterial wall. Several imaging techniques have been utilized in the evaluation of the extent and the severity of VC. Plain radiographs are simple and readily available but with the limitation of decreased sensitivity and subjective and semi-quantitative quantification methods. Mammography, especially useful among women, offers a unique way to study breast arterial calcification, which is largely a medial-type calcification. Ultrasonography is suitable for calcification in superficial arteries. Analyses of wall thickness and lumen size are also possible. Computed tomography (CT) scan, the gold standard, is the most sensitive technique for evaluation of VC. CT scan of coronary artery calcification is not only useful for cardiovascular risk stratification but also offers an accurate and an objective analysis of the severity and progression.