The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the assessment of palpable supraclavicular lymph nodes. The material was analysed in 218 cases with enlarged supraclavicular lymph nodes in which FNAC was performed by the conventional method. In all cases cytological examination was performed on-site after staining the smears by the Papanicolaou method. In addition, air-dried smears, fixed smears, filter preparations from needle washings and cell blocks were studied. The FNAC diagnosis was supported by examining cell blocks which added the reliability of histological architecture; further support was obtained by tissue biopsy and/or comparison with the primary tumour in some of the cases. Eleven cases were diagnosed as inflammatory lesions and 41 cases were unsatisfactory because of scanty/acellular samples (despite two to three repeat samplings). However, in five of these, malignant tumours were later found on biopsy, which was done for persistent enlargement of the supraclavicular lymph node(s). Fifty-three cases were diagnosed as negative for malignancy (normal cellular elements, n=15; reactive elements, n=38) and 12 cases were suspicious of malignancy. In 11 cases a diagnosis of lymphoma was made on histology and in 90 cases metastatic tumours were diagnosed. The overall sensitivity was 92.7%, specificity 98.5%, positive predictive value 97.3% and the negative predictive value was 94.8%. Based on our study we feel that FNAC of palpable supraclavicular lymph nodes as a first line of investigation is a cost-effective procedure and is not only useful in the diagnosis of various lesions but can also help in deciding on appropriate management. Furthermore, the histological architecture from cell blocks can be correlated with cytology, and such material can be used for appropriate histochemical and immunomarker studies, which can be useful in enhancing the diagnosis.

No abstract

Our experience with a total of 7,231 needle aspirates of the breast was reviewed. Ninety-nine cases from the total of 7,231 aspirates studied were from male patients. While an aspiration cytodiagnosis of gynecomastia was made in most of these cases, carcinoma was diagnosed in four cases. Although a clinical distinction between male breast cancer and gynecomastia is often difficult, we found needle aspiration cytology a very useful initial investigation for making this distinction.

A case of angiosarcoma of breast diagnosed by needle aspiration cytology (NAC) is documented. The significant features which enabled the NAC diagnosis included presence of spindly to polygonal malignant endothelial lining cells appearing as papillary tufts merging with solid areas, branching effects, and presence of microacinar structures lined with abnormal spindly to polygonal cells indicative of vasoformative structures. Immunostaining for factor VIII and vimentin was strongly positive in the malignant spindly polygonal endothelial cells and further supported the NAC diagnosis. Similar findings were also seen in sections of cell blocks from aspirate and excised biopsy tissue from the breast tumor in hematoxylin-eosin stained sections and on immunostaining. Despite the rarity of occurrence of angiosarcoma in the breast it was felt that its cytologic diagnosis is possible especially in cases in which the lesion is extensive because of a good chance of getting a cellular sample on aspiration. This can be of considerable value for deciding an appropriate management and as a possible guide to prognosis.

In this study a review of 1948 nipple discharge (ND) samples from 1530 patients in the age range of 18-83 years was undertaken to determine whether cytological findings from ND smears could provide useful diagnostic information regarding various breast lesions. The study included 1494 females and 36 males and was carried out during a period of 20 years 8 months. The clinical information in all patients was obtained from clinicians (coauthors), medical records and a review of biopsies in 205 patients who had undergone surgery following the cytodiagnosis. Of the ND samples examined, 1480 were unilateral while 468 were from 234 bilateral ND. The cytodiagnoses were: benign 624, inadequate (despite two to three repeat samples) 492, inflammatory 96, papillary lesion not otherwise specified (NOS) 229, suspicious 22 (21 females, one male) and malignant 67 (63 females, four males). A breast biopsy in the 22 suspicious cases revealed breast carcinoma in 18 cases (females n = 17, male n = 1), atypical ductal hyperplasia (female n = 1), fibroadenoma (female n = 1) and a papilloma in two females. In the 67 cases with a diagnosis of malignancy 65 revealed a breast carcinoma in the biopsy (female n = 62, male n = 3) while one female was diagnosed as fibroadenoma and one male as florid gynaecomastia. In 63 cases (females n = 61; males n = 2) with clinical lumpy areas consistent with the diagnosis of fibrocystic condition in ND, the biopsy confirmed a fibrocystic process. In 53 of 229 cases with ND findings suggestive of a papillary lesion (NOS) the biopsy revealed a papilloma in 41 cases while in 12 cases no lesion was found. In the remaining cases of all the groups only a clinical follow-up and appropriate investigations were performed with no untoward outcome. Based on our study it is felt that cytological examination of ND smears seems to be a reasonably specific method in the diagnosis of malignant and suspicious cases but may be somewhat less specific for other diagnoses.