Background Acute coronary syndrome is associated with platelet hyperactivity, which in its persistent form, promotes recurrent thrombotic events. Complex cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary syndrome improves clinical outcome; however, its effect on platelet hyperactivity is unknown. Design and methods We enrolled 84 acute coronary syndrome patients on dual antiplatelet therapy, who underwent a new complex cardiac rehabilitation programme (NovaCord physiotherapy, lifestyle counselling, strict diet, stress management and regular coaching) and 51 control acute coronary syndrome patients with traditional cardiac rehabilitation. Platelet functionality was determined at enrolment and at three months follow-up by aggregometry, serum platelet-derived growth factor levels, total- and platelet-derived microvesicle counts (PMV; CD41a+/CD61+, CD62P+). Results Platelet aggregation parameters and platelet-derived growth factor levels were significantly decreased in the complex cardiac rehabilitation group at three months (1 µg/ml collagen, median (interquartile range): 22 (10-45) vs 14 (7.5-25.5)%, p = 0.0015; 2 µg/ml collagen: 36 (22-60) vs 26.5 (16-37)%, p = 0.0019; 1.25 µM adenosine-diphosphate: 4.5 (1-10) vs 1 (0-3)%, p = 0.0006; 5 µM adenosine-diphosphate: 27 (16-38) vs 22 (12-31)%, p = 0.0078; epinephrine: 33 (15-57) vs 27 (12-43)%, p = 0.01; platelet-derived growth factor: 434.6 (256.0-622.7) vs 224.8 (148.5-374.1) pg/ml, p = 0.0001). In contrast, these changes were absent or did not reach statistical significance in the traditional cardiac rehabilitation group. Platelet-derived microvesicle counts were significantly decreased in both groups, while total microvesicle count was significantly reduced only in the complex cardiac rehabilitation group (median (interquartile range): 3945.5 (2138-5661) vs 1739 (780-2303) count/µl; p = 0.0001). Conclusions Platelet hyperactivity three months after acute coronary syndrome significantly decreased in patients undergoing complex cardiac rehabilitation. Besides dual antiplatelet therapy, effective management and comprehensive control of cardiovascular risk factors might represent a new, non-pharmacological approach to influence platelet functionality.

High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) is a predictor of ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention. We conducted a prospective cohort study to identify variables related to HPR in acute coronary syndrome patients who are at high thrombotic risk. We enrolled 463 patients undergoing urgent coronary angiography. Platelet reactivity was measured 12-36 hours after 600 mg clopidogrel loading with multiple electrode aggregometry (Multiplate® analyzer, Roche, Basel, Switzerland, 6.4 µM ADP). HPR was defined by the consensus cut-off area under the curve >46 U. The rate of HPR was 16.0%. We analyzed simple clinical and laboratory parameters with backward multivariate logistic regression and identified the following predictors of HPR: platelet count (per G/L, OR: 1.0073, 95% CI: 1.0035-1.0112, p = 0.0002), CRP level (per mg/L, OR: 1.0077, 95% CI: 1.0016-1.01372, p = 0.01), and active smoking (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.89, p = 0.02). We developed and internally validated a risk prediction model demonstrating moderate discriminative capacity (area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.67). In conclusion, we found a relatively low rate of high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (16.0%) even in an acute patient cohort. HPR measured by Multiplate was associated with high platelet count and CRP level on admission and was inversely related to active smoking. The model with rapidly available simple parameters might help to identify individuals at risk for HPR in the acute setting.

No abstract