Liver transplant recipients are at risk of invasive fungal infections, especially candidiasis. Echinocandin is recommended as prophylactic treatment but is increasingly associated with resistance. Our aim was to assess echinocandin drug resistance in Candida spp. isolated from liver transplant recipients treated with this antifungal class. For this, all liver-transplanted patients in a University Hospital (Créteil, France) between January and June of 2013 and 2015 were included. Susceptibilities of Candida isolates to echinocandins were tested by Etest and the EUCAST reference method. Isolates were analyzed by FKS sequencing and genotyped based on microsatellites or multilocus sequence typing (MLST) profiles. Ninety-four patients were included, and 39 patients were colonized or infected and treated with echinocandin. Echinocandin resistance appeared in 3 (8%) of the treated patients within 1 month of treatment. One patient was colonized by resistant Candida glabrata, one by resistant Candida dubliniensis, and one by resistant Candida albicans. Molecular analysis found three mutations in FKS2 HS1 (F659S, S663A, and D666E) for C. glabrata and one mutation in FKS1 HS1 (S645P) for C. dubliniensis and C. albicans. Susceptible and resistant isolates belonged to the same genotype. To our knowledge, this is the first study on echinocandin resistance in Candida spp. in a liver transplant population. Most resistant isolates were found around/in digestive sites, perhaps due to lower diffusion of echinocandin in these sites. This work documents the risk of emergence of resistance to echinocandin, even after short-term treatment.
Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are complications after liver transplantation involving high morbidity and mortality. (1,3)-β-d-glucan (BG) is a biomarker for IFI, but its utility remains uncertain. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of BG following their diagnosis. Between January 2013 and May 2016, 271 liver transplants were performed in our institution. Serum samples were tested for BG (Fungitell®, Associates Cape Code Inc., Falmouth, MA, USA) at least weekly between liver transplantation and the discharge of patients. Nineteen patients (7%) were diagnosed with IFI, including 13 cases of invasive candidiasis (IC), eight cases of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, and one case of septic arthritis due to Scedosporium apiospernum. Using a single BG sample for the primary analysis of IFI, 95% (21/22) of the subjects had positive BG (>80 pg/mL) at the time of IFI diagnosis. The area under the ROC curves to predict IFI was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73–0.83). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of BG for IFI were 75% (95% CI: 65–83), 65% (62–68), 17% (13–21), and 96% (94–97), respectively. Based on their high NPV, the BG test appears to constitute a good biomarker to rule out a diagnosis of IFI.
bInvasive candidiasis (IC) causes high morbidity and mortality rates after liver transplantation, in part due to delayed diagnosis. The fungal cell wall component (1,3)-beta-D-glucan (BG) could be an early biomarker of IC. This preliminary prospective study was designed to evaluate the contribution of BG measurements to the diagnosis of IC after liver transplantation. All consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation at Henri Mondor Hospital in France between January and June 2013 were enrolled prospectively in the study. They were monitored weekly for colonization by Candida, and colonization index values were calculated. Serum samples were tested for BG (Fungitell; Cape Cod Inc.) at least weekly between liver transplantation and discharge from the hospital. A total of 52 patients (including 39 male patients) were enrolled, with a median age of 55 years (range, 31 to 69 years). The median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 27 (range, 6 to 40). Cultures from 42 patients (81%) yielded Candida spp., with the most common Candida species isolated being Candida glabrata (47%). Six cases of documented IC were found for four of the 52 patients. On the day the clinical diagnosis of IC was made, analysis based on combining two sequential BG-positive samples (>146 pg/ml) and a colonization index of >0.5 revealed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) results of 83%, 89%, 50%, and 97.6%, respectively. The detection of BG associated with Candida colonization may be a promising tool based on a high NPV that can rule out IC among high-risk patients. Liver transplant recipients are at relatively high risk of developing invasive fungal disease (IFD) (1-4). The most common invasive fungal pathogens are Candida spp., followed by Aspergillus spp. (1, 5, 6). Such infections develop in 5% to 10% of transplant recipients and are a major cause of postoperative morbidity and death (4,(7)(8)(9). This is related in part to delayed or missed diagnoses because of the low sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic tests currently available (1, 10, 11). A serological diagnostic method, i.e., quantification of (1,3)-beta-D-glucan (BG), was recently recommended in the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guidelines on the detection of candidemia in adults (12). BG is a cell wall constituent found in many pathogenic fungi, including Candida, Aspergillus, and Pneumocystis, and it can be detected in patient sera during invasive disease caused by these fungi. In a meta-analysis, Karageorgopoulos et al. showed that BG detection displayed good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of IFD in the general population (13). In the setting of invasive candidiasis (IC), the detection sensitivity of BG ranged from 64% to 100% (14-16). However, the BG assay has not been assessed extensively in populations with solid organ transplants. One study evaluated a preemptive strategy that involved the use of BG monitoring to enable the ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.