Background Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Anticoagulants have not been studied in randomised controlled trials with CrCl < 30 ml/min. The objective of this review was to identify the impact of different anticoagulant strategies in patients with advanced CKD including dialysis. Methods We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies, searching electronic databases from 1946 to 2022. Studies that evaluated both thrombotic and bleeding outcomes with anticoagulant use in CrCl < 50 ml/min were included. Results Our initial search yielded 14,503 papers with 53 suitable for inclusion. RCTs comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin for patients with VTE and CrCl 30-50 ml/min found no difference in recurrent VTE events (RR 0.68(95% CI 0.42–1.11)) with reduced bleeding (RR 0.65 (95% CI 0.45–0.94)). Observational data in haemodialysis suggest lower risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding with apixaban versus warfarin. Very few studies examining outcomes were available for therapeutic and prophylactic dose low molecular weight heparin for CrCl < 30 ml/min. Findings for patients with AF on dialysis were that warfarin or DOACs had a similar or higher risk of stroke compared to no anticoagulation. For patients with AF and CrCl < 30 ml/min not on dialysis, anticoagulation should be considered on an individual basis, with limited studies suggesting DOACs may have a preferable safety profile. Conclusion Further studies are still required, some ongoing, in patients with advanced CKD (CrCl < 30 ml/min) to identify the safest and most effective treatment options for VTE and AF.

A survey to gain insight into anticoagulant prescribing practice in the setting of chronic kidney disease (CKD) across the UK was disseminated via renal and haematology networks. Areas of anticoagulant use included patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), requiring thromboprophylaxis for VTE, Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and nephrotic syndrome.An online-survey was disseminated via British Haematology Society, UK Kidney Association, and Renal Pharmacy Group over a five month period. All responses were voluntary and anonymous.Among 117 responses there were 49 nephrology doctors, 47 renal pharmacists and 20 haematology clinicians. A specialist multidisciplinary team to discuss the specific anticoagulant management of these patients was only available to 3% (4/117) respondents. Renal function estimate used for anticoagulant dosing was mainly Cockcroft-Gault for pharmacists and haematology but lab-based estimates were used by nephrology doctors. Therapeutic dose of Low Molecular Weight Heparin was mostly likely to be reduced by one-third when used for VTE treatment, with the majority of units undertaking anti-Xa monitoring in CKD stage 5 and dialysis. Direct-acting Oral Anticoagulants are being used in patients with nephrotic syndrome, those with CKD stage 5 and on dialysis for VTE and AF in the absence of license in these indications.This survey highlighted the significant differences between anticoagulant prescribing in CKD between two professional specialties and marked variation between centres in anticoagulant management strategies employed for these patients. With gaps still existing in the evidence base and answers to these not expected within the next few years, development of a best-practice guideline would be warranted to support clinicians in this field.

No abstract

No abstract

3303 Introduction: Despite improvement in frontline therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), central nervous system (CNS) relapse remains a significant clinical problem. The ALLR3 trial (ISCRTN 45724312) was designed specifically to address this issue with the use of drugs known to penetrate the CNS. The trial incorporated a randomization between Mitoxantrone and Idarubicin during induction. Mitoxantrone showed an early benefit in all patients resulting in closure of the randomization in December 2007 (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts, Nov 2009; 114:3390). Subsequently all patients now receive Mitoxantrone. Here we report on the outcome of patients with isolated CNS relapse (iCNSr) or combined CNS relapse (involvement of CNS and bone marrow, cCNSr). Methods: CNS involvement was defined as ≥5 WBC/μl with morphological evidence of blasts in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Combined relapse (cCNSr) was defined as CNS disease with ≥ 5% blasts in the bone marrow. Time to relapse was classified as, Very Early: within 18 months of first diagnosis; Early: after 18 months of first diagnosis but within 6 months of stopping therapy and Late: more than 6 months after stopping therapy. All patients received 3 blocks of chemotherapy. Subsequently, allogenic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) was offered to all very early relapses (iCNSr & cCNSr), early iCNSr (irrespective of immunophenotype), all T-cell cCNSr (irrespective of time to relapse) and early or late pre-B cCNSr that had a minimal residual disease level of ≥ 104 at the end of induction. All other patients were offered chemotherapy and cranial radiotherapy. Results: Of a total of 330 relapsed patients, 102 (31%) had CNS involvement. Of these 63 (62%) had iCNSr and 39 (38%) had cCNSr. The incidence of CNS disease was higher in males (M:F, CNS relapses 2.5:1 vs all relapses 1.5:1). CNS relapses had a higher proportion of T-cell disease (pre B:T CNS relapses 3.6:1 vs all relapses 7.8:1]. The number of patients presenting in very early, early and late phases were 19 (19%), 55 (54%) and 28 (27%) respectively. All late iCNSr patients were males. Almost all late relapses (iCNSr and cCNSr) (27/28) were of a pre B phenotype. At the end of induction phase, 91/102 (89%) achieved complete remission (CR) and 82/102 (80%) remained in CR after 3 blocks of chemotherapy. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) for all patients with CNS disease was 45.5% (95%CI 32.9, 58.0) & 43.4% (95%CI 32.0, 54.7) respectively. There were no significant differences in survival with respect to site of the disease (combined vs isolated), gender or immunophenotype (pre B vs T). As shown in Table 1, CNS relapse patients who received Mitoxantrone had a significantly improved outcome when compared to those who received Idarubicin. This was most evident in those who had i) iCNSr, ii) pre-B phenotype and iii) allo-SCT, when analyzed on an intention to treat basis. This represents a considerable improvement in outcome compared to the results obtained in these sub-groups of patients in the previous UK ALLR2 study (Roy A et.al. Br. J. Haem. 2005;130:67-75). Conclusion: Mitoxantrone is highly effective in children with relapsed pre B ALL who have CNS involvement. As there were no other differences between patients treated on Mitoxantrone or Idarubicin, effective systemic therapy is as important as CNS directed therapy, if not more, in treating patients with CNS relapse. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Most drugs used in this protocol are off label as the majority of drugs used in childhood ALL are not liscensed for use in children.