IMPORTANCEThe number of very elderly (Ն80 years) is rapidly growing worldwide. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are common in this age group and treatment is often challenging in this population.OBJECTIVE Obtaining an overview of the epidemiology and clinicopathological features of BCC in the very elderly to guide clinicians and policy makers.EVIDENCE REVIEW A systematic review of literature was performed using PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and the Cochrane Library. Study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction was performed by 2 independent reviewers. For quality assessment (including the risk of bias) the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist was used, combined with the Quality Rating Scheme for Studies and Other Evidence. Data were described though a narrative synthesis and tabulation.FINDINGS Of 13 628 studies identified, 83 studies were included and quality assesment was performed for 76 studies; 27 studies (representing >350 000 patients) were found that included age-specific incidence rates of BCC in the very elderly. High and increasing incidence rates of BCC in the very elderly were found ranging from 13 to 12 112 per 100 000 person-years, strongly depending on factors like study population and clinical setting. Basal cell carcinoma in the very elderly were more common in men, mostly of the nodular subtype, and located in the head and neck region. Interpretation and generalization of the data was limited by the heterogeneity of study populations, methods, and outcomes. Data concerning impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and prognostication were scarce. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEThe incidence of BCC among the very elderly is high and increasing. Epidemiologic and clinicopathological data from current literature provide only limited guidance in clinical decision making owing to heterogeneity and scarcity. Future research should focus more specifically on BCC in the very elderly, together with prognostication and their relation with HRQoL in both the short and longer term.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare neuroendocrine tumor of the skin mainly seen in the elderly. Its incidence is rising due to ageing of the population, increased sun exposure, and the use of immunosuppressive medication. Additionally, with the availability of specific immunohistochemical markers, MCC is easier to recognize. Typically, these tumors are rapidly progressive and behave aggressively, emphasizing the need for early detection and prompt diagnostic work-up and start of treatment. In this review, the tumor biology and immunology, current diagnostic and treatment modalities, as well as new and combined therapies for MCC, are discussed. MCC is a very immunogenic tumor which offers good prospects for immunotherapy. Given its rarity, the aggressiveness, and the frail patient population it concerns, MCC should be managed in close collaboration with an experienced multidisciplinary team.

More attention to items related to frail older adults in NMSC CPGs is broadly desired, but CPG integration of these items is currently limited. More integration might stimulate more holistic, personalized and patient-centred care in frail older adults.

Summary Background The rising incidence rates of skin cancer (SC) lead to an enormous burden on healthcare systems. General practitioners (GPs) might play an important part in SC care, but research has shown poor clinical recognition of SC, leading to a high rate of potentially unnecessary referrals. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate if a dermato‐oncological training programme (DOTP) for GPs improved their diagnostic skills and quality of referrals. Methods Out of 194 GPs in the Nijmegen area, 83 (42·8%) followed a DOTP on SC. Referrals from both a trained cohort (TC) and two cohorts of untrained GPs [untrained present cohort (UPC) and untrained historical cohort (UHC)] were included. Data on diagnostic skills, quality of referrals and the number of potentially unnecessary referrals were evaluated. Results A total number of 1662 referrals were analysed. The referral diagnosis was correct more often in the TC (70·3%) compared with the UPC (56·2%; P < 0·001) and the UHC (51·6%; P < 0·001). Furthermore, the TC also provided a better lesion description, mentioned a diagnosis more often in their referral letters and more often performed diagnostics before referral. In addition, fewer potentially unnecessary referrals were identified in the TC compared with the UPC (62·7% vs. 73·7%; P < 0·001) and the UHC (75·2%; P < 0·001). Conclusions GPs who followed a DOTP had better diagnostic skills and quality of referrals than untrained GPs, leading to fewer potentially unnecessary referrals. This might enhance a more efficient use of the limited capacity in secondary dermatological care and consequently lead to lower healthcare costs.