ObjectiveThe clinical and prognostic implications of a hypertensive response to exercise after repair of coarctation of the aorta (CoA) remain controversial. We aimed to determine the prevalence of a hypertensive response to exercise, identify factors associated with peak exercise systolic blood pressure (SBP) and explore the association of peak exercise SBP with resting blood pressure and cardiovascular events during follow-up.MethodsFrom the Dutch national CONgenital CORvitia (CONCOR) registry, adults with repaired CoA who underwent exercise stress testing were included. A hypertensive response to exercise was defined as a peak exercise SBP ≥210 mm Hg in men and ≥190 mm Hg in women. Cardiovascular events consisted of coronary artery disease, stroke, aortic complications and cardiovascular death.ResultsOf the original cohort of 920 adults with repaired CoA, 675 patients (median age 24 years (range 16–72 years)) underwent exercise stress testing. Of these, 299 patients (44%) had a hypertensive response to exercise. Mean follow-up duration was 10.1 years. Male sex, absence of a bicuspid aortic valve and elevated resting SBP were independently associated with increased peak exercise SBP. Peak exercise SBP was positively predictive of office SBP (β=0.11, p<0.001) and 24-hour SBP (β=0.05, p=0.03) at follow-up, despite correction for baseline SBP. During follow-up, 100 patients (15%) developed at least 1 cardiovascular event. Peak exercise SBP was not significantly associated with the occurrence of cardiovascular events (HR 0.994 (95% CI 0.987 to 1.001), p=0.11).ConclusionsA hypertensive response to exercise was present in nearly half of the patients in this large, prospective cohort of adults with repaired CoA. Risk factors for increased peak exercise SBP were male sex, absence of a bicuspid aortic valve and elevated resting SBP. Increased peak exercise SBP independently predicted hypertension at follow-up. These results support close follow-up of patients with a hypertensive response to exercise to ensure timely diagnosis and treatment of future hypertension.
Background The long‐term burden of cardiovascular disease after repair of coarctation of the aorta (CoA) has not been elucidated. We aimed to determine the incidence of and risk factors for cardiovascular events in adult patients with repaired CoA. Additionally, mortality rates were compared between adults with repaired CoA and the general population. Methods and Results Using the Dutch Congenital Corvitia (CONCOR) registry, patients aged ≥16 years with previous surgical or transcatheter CoA repair from 5 tertiary referral centers were included. Cardiovascular events were recorded, comprising coronary artery disease, stroke/transient ischemic attack, aortic complications, arrhythmias, heart failure hospitalizations, endocarditis, and cardiovascular death. In total, 920 patients (median age, 24 years [range 16–74 years]) were included. After a mean follow‐up of 9.3±5.1 years, 191 patients (21%) experienced at least 1 cardiovascular event. A total of 270 cardiovascular events occurred, of which aortic complications and arrhythmias were most frequent. Older age at initial CoA repair (hazard ratio [HR], 1.017; 95% CI, 1.000–1.033 [ P =0.048]) and elevated left ventricular mass index (HR, 1.009; 95% CI, 1.005–1.013 [ P <0.001]) were independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. The mortality rate was 3.3 times higher than expected based on an age‐ and sex‐matched cohort from the Dutch general population (standardized mortality ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.3–4.4 [ P <0.001]). Conclusions This large, prospective cohort of adults with repaired CoA showed a high burden of cardiovascular events, particularly aortic complications and arrhythmias, during long‐term follow‐up. Older age at initial CoA repair and elevated left ventricular mass index were independent risk factors for the occurrence of cardiovascular events. Mortality was 3.3‐fold higher compared with the general population. These results advocate stringent follow‐up after CoA repair and emphasize the need for improved preventive strategies.
Aims Aortic wall shear stress (WSS) distributions in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients have been associated with aortic dilatation, but prospective, longitudinal data are missing. This study assessed differences in aortic WSS distributions between BAV patients and healthy controls and determined the association of WSS with aortic growth in patients. Methods and results Sixty subjects underwent four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the thoracic aorta (32 BAV patients and 28 healthy controls). Peak velocity, pulse wave velocity, aortic distensibility, peak systolic WSS (magnitude, axial, and circumferential), and WSS angle were assessed. WSS angle is defined as the angle between the WSSmagnitude and WSSaxial component. In BAV patients, three-year computed tomography angiography-based aortic volumetric growth was determined in the proximal and entire ascending aorta. WSSaxial was significantly lower in BAV patients compared with controls (0.93 vs. 0.72 Pa, P = 0.047) and WSScircumferential and WSS angle were significantly higher (0.29 vs. 0.64 Pa and 18° vs. 40°, both P < 0.001). Significant volumetric growth of the proximal ascending aorta occurred in BAV patients (from 49.1 to 52.5 cm3, P = 0.003). In multivariable analysis corrected for baseline aortic volume and diastolic blood pressure, WSS angle was the only parameter independently associated with proximal aortic growth (P = 0.031). In the entire ascending aorta, besides the WSS angle, the WSSmagnitude was also independently associated with growth. Conclusion Increased WSScircumferential and especially WSS angle are typical in BAV patients. WSS angle was found to predict aortic growth. These findings highlight the potential role of WSS measurements in BAV patients to stratify patients at risk for aortic dilation.
Previously, median effective dose (ED) of 1.6 mSv per three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) has been reported. This study evaluated ED and image quality in 3DRA after implementation of a simple dose reduction protocol in pediatric catheterizations. Simple conversion factors between 3DRA ED and readily available parameters at the cathlab were determined. The dose reduction protocol consisted of frame reduction (60–30 frames/s (f/s)), active collimation of the X-ray beam, usage of a readily available low dosage program, and a pre-3DRA run check. EDs were calculated with Monte Carlo PCXMC 2.0. Three observers blindly assessed 3DRA image quality of the dose reduction and normal-dose cohort. Between October 2014 and October 2015, 84 patients (median age 4.3 years) underwent 100 3DRAs with a median ED of 0.54 mSv (0.12–2.2) using the dose reduction protocol. Median ED in the normal-dose cohort (17 3DRAs) was 1.6 mSv (1.2–4.9). Image quality in the dose reduction cohort remained excellent. Correlations between ED and dose area product (DAP) and ED and skin dose were found with a ρ of 0.82 and 0.83, respectively. ED exposure of the entire catheterization was reduced to 2.64 mSv. Introduction of a simple protocol led to 66% dose reduction in 3DRA and 79% in the entire catheterization. 3DRA image quality in this group remained excellent. In 3DRA ED correlates well with DAP and skin dose, parameters readily available at the cathlab.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s00246-018-1943-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.