In this work, we investigated the differences and similarities among some perturbation approaches, such as the classical perturbation theory, Poincaré–Lindstedt technique, multiple scales method, the KB averaging method, and averaging theory. The necessary conditions to construct the periodic solutions for the spatial quantized Hill problem—in this context, the periodic solutions emerging from the equilibrium points for the spatial Hill problem—were evaluated by using the averaging theory, under the perturbation effect of quantum corrections. This model can be used to develop a Lunar theory and the families of periodic orbits in the frame work for the spatial quantized Hill problem. Thereby, these applications serve to reinforce the obtained results on these periodic solutions and gain its own significance.
In this work, the quantized Hill problem is considered in order for us to study the existence and stability of equilibrium points. In particular, we have studied three different cases which give all whole possible locations in which two points are emerging from the first case and four points from the second case, while the third case does not provide a realistic locations. Hence, we have obtained four new equilibrium points related to the quantum perturbations. Furthermore, the allowed and forbidden regions of motion of the first case are investigated numerically. We demonstrate that the obtained result in the first case is a generalization to the classical one and it can be reduced to the classical result in the absence of quantum perturbation, while the four new points will disappear. The regions of allowed motions decrease as the value of the Jacobian constant increases, and these regions will form three separate areas. Thus, the infinitesimal body can never move from one allowed region to another, and it will be trapped inside one of the possible regions of motion with the relative large values of the Jacobian constant.
This work is divided to two parts; the first part analyzes the features of Hénon–Heiles’s potential and finding the energy levels for bounded and unbounded motions. The critical points are explored in different phase spaces from the classical potential to the generalized one. In the second part, the possible solutions of the generalized (fifth-degree) Hénon–Heiles system are analyzed using the averaging theory. Two consequent transformations are used to set the Hamiltonian of this system in standard form for applying the averaging theory. In this context, eight solutions are found, where one of them is not convenient for the proposed assumptions, and the other seven solutions are proper and adequate to represent seven periodic orbits for the generalized Hénon–Heiles dynamical system, which has at least seven periodic orbits.
In this paper, we study the existence and stability of collinear and noncollinear equilibrium points within the frame of the perturbed restricted problem of 2 + 2 bodies by a planetesimal belt. We compare and investigate the corresponding results of the perturbed and unperturbed models. The impact of the planetesimal belt is observed on collinear and noncollinear equilibrium points. We demonstrate that all equilibrium points are unstable, and we numerically investigate the noncollinear equilibrium points. Finally, we emphasize that the proposed problem is a credible model for describing the capture of small bodies by a planet.
We consider the curved 4-body problems on spheres and hyperbolic spheres. After obtaining a criterion for the existence of quadrilateral configurations on the equator of the sphere, we study two restricted 4-body problems, one in which two masses are negligible and another in which only one mass is negligible. In the former, we prove the evidence square-like relative equilibria, whereas in the latter we discuss the existence of kite-shaped relative equilibria.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.