Purpose: A diagnosis of testicular cancer (TC) at a relatively young age can have a dramatic impact on the psychological well-being of those affected. The aim of this review was to synthesize recent evidence to provide an updated account of the prevalence, severity and correlates of anxiety, depression, fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and distress in TC survivors. Patients and Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted from September 2017 until June 2020 using electronic databases including Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science. Study eligibility and quality were independently assessed by two reviewers. Narrative synthesis was used to depict the severity (mean/median scores), prevalence (proportions above standard clinical thresholds) and correlates of study outcomes. Results: A total of 988 articles were identified for screening after duplicate removal. Fiftysix full-text articles were screened, and eight articles met the inclusion criteria. The reported prevalence of the outcomes varied across studies (clinical levels of anxiety ranged from 6.9% to 21.1%, depression varied from 4.7% to 7%, distress was found between 25% and 41.4%, prevalence of FCR was not reported). Few studies compared TC survivors with other populations. Correlates of poorer psychological outcomes included younger age, relationship status, employment status, poorer sexual functioning, impaired masculinity and coping strategies. Conclusion: Anxiety seems to be the most common issue for TC survivors. Men who are single or unemployed appear most at risk of poorer psychological outcomes, which seem associated with impaired masculinity and sexual function. More research is needed to identify TC survivors most likely to need one of the increasing number of psychological interventions being developed for TC survivors.

Background: Testicular cancer and its treatment can have major short-and long-term effects on the health-related quality of life of those affected. This systematic review aims to summarise patient-reported outcome (PRO) data concerning health-related quality of life, functional impacts and common side-effects of treatments for testicular cancer. Methods: We systematically searched Medline OVID, CINAHL, PubMed, Embase and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Over Time In Oncology (PROMOTION) databases from inception to 25 March 2020, using "testicular cancer" and "PRO" search terms developed in conjunction with a medical librarian. Two authors screened abstracts and full-text articles for studies that reported primary PRO data related to the treatment of testicular cancer including at least 50 participants. We excluded psychosocial data as this was included in our companion review. Data were extracted by three reviewers, and quality was assessed by two reviewers using QUAL-SYST. Studies with a quality of score over 65% were included in our narrative synthesis. Results: A total of 1831 records were identified via our database searches and 41 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 35 included participants who had chemotherapy. Twenty-eight different PRO measures were used across the 41 studies. Of the 41 studies, 29 had quality scores over 65% and were included in our narrative synthesis. We found that chemotherapy was generally associated with a higher side-effect burden than other treatments, and higher burden was associated with higher doses of chemotherapy. Hearing problems, peripheral neuropathy, and Raynaud's phenomena were particularly common side-effects. Problems with sexual functioning were associated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. Discussion: While many studies found that between-treatment differences resolved within the first 12 months since diagnosis, there were many long-term and dose-dependent impacts associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy across PRO domains. Offering information about these aspects, and information about expected survival outcomes, will help inform, prepare, and empower patients to make decisions about treatment aligned with their preferences and personal situations.

TNBC affects women at a relatively young age and tends to recur early. Survival following metastatic disease is short, and more effective therapies are needed.

11023 Background: Imatinib (IM) is the standard first-line treatment for advanced GIST and regorafenib (REG) is approved for third line therapy. We studied if an alternating regimen of two tyrosine kinase inhibitors, IM and REG, delays resistance to IM and improves outcomes. Methods: ALT-GIST (NCT02365441) is a randomised non-comparative phase II trial to investigate the efficacy of an alternating regimen (ALT) of 21-25 days of IM 400mg orally daily followed by a 3-7-day gap for washout followed by 21 days of REG 160 mg orally daily and a 7-day gap for washout. The control arm was continuous IM 400mg daily. Delayed recruitment led to revised endpoints of activity and safety. To assess clinical activity, the best objective tumor response (OTR) at 9 months was deemed to be an appropriate endpoint in the revised protocol. Results: Seventy-six eligible patients (ALT 40, IM 36) enrolled from June 2015 to September 2018 were evaluable for the OTR. The patients (pts) were predominately male (n = 51, 67%). Median age was 58 (range, 24-81) in the ALT arm and 65 (range, 35-82) in the IM arm. KIT was mutated in 63, PDGFR in 2, and wildtype in 5 tumors. Relative dose intensity in the ALT arm 102% for IM and 82% for REG and was 93% in the IM arm. Median follow-up time was 19.3 months (range 6.0-40.0).The best responses to the ALT and IM treatments were similar at 9 months, 1 vs 0 pts had complete response, 23 vs 23 partial response, 15 vs 13 stable disease, and the OTR was 60% (95% CI, 45-74%) and 64% (95% CI, 48-78%), respectively. Seven (18%) pts in ALT arm and 10 (28%) in IM arm discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. Seven pts (18%) in the ALT arm stopped protocol therapy due to unacceptable toxicity, and none in the IM arm. Fifteen (38%) pts in the ALT arm and 14 (38%) in the IM arm had serious adverse events, mostly grade 3. Progression free survival (PFS) at 1 year was ALT 0.86 (95%CI:0.69,0.94) and IMI 0.83 (95% CI 0.65-0.92), p logrank = 0.57. Conclusions: There was no meaningful difference in the primary endpoint of OTR and in PFS between the groups in this first analysis of ALT-GIST, and no unexpected safety signals. The study is ongoing and other endpoints will be reported in due course. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12614000950662.