Background: Identifying the long-term predictors of recurrent cardiovascular events may help improve the quality of care and prevent subsequent events. We aimed to investigate the predictors of 1-year major cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients discharged after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in a tertiary hospital in Iran. Methods: This registry-based cohort study included consecutive STEMI patients between 2016 and 2019 in Imam-Ali Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran. All patients discharged alive from STEMI hospitalization were followed up for 1 year for MACE, consisting of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke. We estimated the hazard ratio (HR) and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using Cox proportional-hazard models to evaluate potential predictors, including demographic characteristics, medical history, cardiovascular risk factors, laboratory tests, reperfusion therapy, and medications. Results: During 2187.2 person-years, 21 patients were lost to follow-up (success rate =99.1%). Of 2274 post-discharge STEMI patients (mean age =60.26 y; 21.9% female), 151 (6.6%) experienced MACE, including, all-cause mortality (n=115, 5.1%), nonfatal MI (n=20, 0.9%), and nonfatal stroke (n=16, 0.7%). Independent predictors of MACE were age (HR:1.02; 95% CI: 1.00–1.04), no education vs ≥12 years of formal schooling (HR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.17–3.67), stroke history (HR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.48–3.81), the glomerular filtration rate (HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97–1.00), the body mass index (HR: 0.94; 95% CI:, 0.89–0.99), peak creatine kinase-MB (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 1.00–1.002), thrombolysis vs primary percutaneous coronary intervention (HR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.21–2.81), and left ventricular ejection fraction <35% vs ≥50% (HR: 2.82; 95% CI: 1.46–5.47). Conclusion: Age, education, stroke history, the glomerular filtration rate, the body mass index, peak creatine kinase-MB, reperfusion therapy, and left ventricular function can be independently associated with 1-year MACE.

Background: Considerable variability in survival rate after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is present and outcomes remain suboptimal, especially in low- and middle-income contraries. This study aimed to investigate predictors of 30- day mortality after STEMI, including reperfusion therapy, in a tertiary hospital in western Iran. Methods: In this registry-based cohort study (2016–2019), we investigated reperfusion therapies – primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), pharmaco-invasive (thrombolysis followed by angiography/percutaneous coronary intervention), and thrombolysis alone – used in Imam-Ali hospital, the only hospital with a PPCI capability in the Kermanshah Province. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using Cox proportional-hazard models, to investigate the potential predictors of 30-day mortality including reperfusion therapy, admission types (direct admission/referral from non-PPCI-capable hospitals), demographic variables, coronary risk factors, vital signs on admission, medical history, and laboratory tests. Results: Data of 2428 STEMI patients (mean age: 60.73; 22.9% female) were available. Reperfusion therapy was performed in 84% of patients (58% PPCI, 10% pharmaco-invasive, 16% thrombolysis alone). Only 17% of the referred patients had received thrombolysis at non-PPCI-capable hospitals. Among patients with thrombolysis, only 38.2% underwent coronary angiography/ percutaneous coronary intervention. The independent predictors of mortality were: no reperfusion therapy (HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.36–2.97), referral from non-PPCI-capable hospitals (1.73, 1.22–2.46), age (1.03, 1.01–1.04), glomerular filtration rate (0.97, 0.96–0.97), heart rate>100 bpm (1.94, 1.22–3.08), and systolic blood pressure<100 mm Hg (4.92, 3.43–7.04). Mortality was lower with the pharmaco-invasive approach, although statistically non-significant, than other reperfusion therapies. Conclusion: Reperfusion therapy, admission types, age, glomerular filtration rate, heart rate, and blood pressure were independently associated with 30-day mortality. Using a comprehensive STEMI network to increase reperfusion therapy, especially pharmaco-invasive therapy, is recommended.

Background: Doing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the first hours of myocardial infraction (MI) is effective in re-establishment of blood flow. Anticoagulation treatment should be prescribed in patients undergoing PCI to decrease the side effects of ischemia. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of heparin prescription after PCI on short-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Materials: This randomized clinical trial study was conducted at Imam Ali cardiovascular center at Kermanshah university of medical science (KUMS), Iran. Between April 2019 to October 2019, 400 patients with STEMI which candidate to PCI were enrolled. Patients randomly divided in two groups: intervention group (received 5,000 units of heparin after PCI until first 24 hours, every 6 hours) and control group (did not receive heparin). Data were collected using a checklist developed based on the study's aims. Differences between groups were assessed using independent t-tests and chi-square (or Fisher exact tests).Result: Observed that, mean prothrombin time (PT) (13.30±1.60 vs. 12.21±1.15, p<0.001) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) (35.30±3.08 vs. 34.41±3.01, p=0.003) were significantly higher in intervention group compared to control group. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0/1 after primary PCI was significantly more frequently in control group (5.5% vs. 1.0%, p=0.034). The mean of ejection fraction (EF) after PCI (47.58±7.12 vs. 45.15±6.98, p<0.001) was significantly higher in intervention group. Intervention group had a statistically significant shorter length of hospital stay (4.71±1.03 vs. 6.12±1.10, p<0.001). There was higher incidence of re-vascularization (0% vs. 3.0%; p=0.013) and re-MI (0% vs. 2.5%; p=0.024) in the control group.Conclusion: Performing primary PCI with receiving heparin led to improve TIMI flow and consequently better EF. Receiving heparin is associated with lower risk of re-MI and re-vascularization.

Objectives Older diabetic patients with myocardial infarction (MI) are vulnerable group. This study aims to compare the prevalence of risk factors, type of reperfusion therapy, and mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic elderly with MI. Methods & Materials This is a cohort study. The statistical population consists of all older adults (age ≥60 years), whose information was available in the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) registry system of Imam Ali hospital in Kermanshah, Iran from July 2016 to January 2020. Of these, 1460 participants with STEMI were selected based on the inclusion criteria and divided into two diabetic and non-diabetic groups. Their information was recorded by trained nurses using a checklist surveying demographic information, medical records, cardiovascular disease risk factors, clinical and diagnostic tests, type of treatment, and death at the time of admission, hospitalization and discharge. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, Mann-Whitney and chi-square test in Stata software, version 14. P<0.05 was considered as significant level. Results The number of diabetic women (47.11%) was significantly higher than the number of those without diabetes (25.60%) (P<0.001). The mean LDL and cholesterol levels in non-diabetics was significantly higher than diabetics (P<0.001). The mean HDL was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.777). The number of patients with BMI≥30, history of myocardial infarction, blood lipid, hypertension, triglyceride level, and glomerular filtration rate <60 were significantly higher in the diabetic group than in the non-diabetic group. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the variables of place of residence, literacy level, smoking, history of stroke, coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery. In addition, there was no significant difference in mortality rate and type of reperfusion treatment between the two groups. Conclusion Some of risk factors for MI are different between diabetic and non-diabetic elderly with MI. The results of this study can provide useful information to experts in this field to develop lifestyle modification programs by making drug prescription more purposeful and providing awareness for this group of patients.

Objectives The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors is different in the elderly and middle-aged. Therefore the present study aims to compare the prevalence of risk factors affecting ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), type of treatment, and mortality rate in these two groups. Methods & Materials This retrospective cohort study included 1 071 elderly and middle-aged ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients who had referred to Kermanshah Imam Ali Hospital for 23 months from January 2017 to November 2019. Demographic information, cardiovascular risk factors, type of treatment, and mortality were examined. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, independent t test, and Chi-square test in Stata software version 14 with a significance level of 0.05. Results In the present study, the prevalence of risk factors, including smoking, high triglyceride, overweight, and obesity in the middle-aged group was significantly more than the elderly group (P < 0.05). The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) mean (mg/dL) in the middle-aged group (99.26 ± 71.69) was significantly higher than the elderly group (96.29 ± 8.5) (P < 0.05). The rate of primary angioplasty use was higher in the middle-aged (55.31%) than in the elderly (48.52%). Other results indicated that the overall mortality rate in the elderly (15.7%) was higher than in the middle-aged (4.4%) (P < 0.001). The prevalence of myocardial infarction, stroke, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 was significantly higher in the elderly group compared to the middle-aged (P < 0.05). Conclusion The prevalence of low glomerular filtration rate (GFR), hyperlipidemia, and hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke is higher in the elderly than in the middle-aged, while the prevalence of vital risk factors, such as smoking, triglycerides, overweight, and obesity in the middle-aged group is significantly higher than the elderly. If these risk factors are planned and controlled in middle age, people will be less at risk for myocardial infarction in aging.