There is a growing consensus that perceptions of coherence, purpose, and mattering represent primary indicators of the subjective experience of meaning in life (MIL; Costin & Vignoles, 2019). While these variables are supported by recent empirical research, it is unclear whether they encompass all information people consider when judging the meaningfulness of their lives. Based on the ideas of classic (Frankl, 1986) and contemporary (Martella & Steger, 2016) meaning in life scholars, the current research examines whether valuing one’s life experiences, or experiential appreciation (EA), constitutes another unique indicator of MIL. Study 1 provided support for this idea showing that a theorized hub of meaning, generativity, was uniquely associated with purpose, mattering, and EA. Studies 2-4 used cross sectional and daily diary methodology to directly support the claim that EA predicted global evaluation of MIL above and beyond the contribution of coherence, purpose, mattering. Finally, Studies 5 & 6 experimentally influenced EA by exposing participants stimuli high in intrinsic value (awe inspiring videos), and showed that the EA manipulation indirectly influenced MIL. Importantly, in both studies, these indirect effects were not found though other indicators of MIL. Overall, these findings support Frankl’s argument that valuing one’s experiences is uniquely tied to perceptions of meaning. Implications for the incorporation of EA as a primary indicator of MIL are discussed. This manuscript has not yet been published

A widespread lay theory suggests that following one’s true self leads to satisfying decision-making. Empirical research suggests that when people feel like they have followed their true self, they indeed feel more satisfied with their decisions. We aimed to examine a potential boundary condition of this effect: decision-making in the context of moral dilemmas that seemingly lack an easy solution. We suspected that this may be a boundary condition because another growing line of research suggests that people believe true selves are morally good. Thus, when people encounter a moral dilemma, they may feel like they are violating their moral true self no matter what they choose. In turn, they may feel dissatisfied with their choices when they believe they are following their true self relative to employing other decision-making instructions. Three experiments (total N = 568) were designed to test whether and how attempts to follow one’s true self influences decision satisfaction in moral dilemmas. The results consistently indicate that attempts to follow the true