Advances in drug potency and tailored therapeutics are promoting pharmaceutical manufacturing to transition from a traditional batch paradigm to more flexible continuous processing. Here we report the development of a multistep continuous-flow CGMP (current good manufacturing practices) process that produced 24 kilograms of prexasertib monolactate monohydrate suitable for use in human clinical trials. Eight continuous unit operations were conducted to produce the target at roughly 3 kilograms per day using small continuous reactors, extractors, evaporators, crystallizers, and filters in laboratory fume hoods. Success was enabled by advances in chemistry, engineering, analytical science, process modeling, and equipment design. Substantial technical and business drivers were identified, which merited the continuous process. The continuous process afforded improved performance and safety relative to batch processes and also improved containment of a highly potent compound.

A fully continuous process including an asymmetric hydrogenation reaction operating at 70 bar hydrogen, aqueous extraction, and crystallization was designed, developed, and demonstrated at pilot scale. This paper highlights safety, quality, and throughput advantages of the continuous reaction and separations unit operations. Production of 144 kg of product was accomplished in laboratory fume hoods and a laboratory hydrogenation bunker over two continuous campaigns. Maximum continuous flow vessel size in the lab hoods was 22 L glassware, and maximum plug flow tube reactor (PFR) size in the bunker was 73 L. The main safety advantages of running the hydrogenation reaction continuous rather than batch were that the flow reactor was smaller for the same throughput and, more importantly, the tubular hydrogenation reactor ran 95% liquid filled at steady state. Therefore, the amount of hydrogen in the reactor at any one time was less than that of batch. A two-stage mixed suspension–mixed product removal (MSMPR) cascade was used for continuous crystallization. Impurity rejection by continuous crystallization was superior to that by batch because scalable residence time and steady-state supersaturation enabled robust and repeatable control of enantiomer rejection in a kinetic regime, although this is a nonstandard approach, debatable as an impurity control strategy. The fully continuous wet-end process running in a laboratory infrastructure achieved the same weekly throughput that would be expected from traditional batch processing in a plant module with 400 L vessels.

This manuscript provides the results of an in-depth survey assessment of the capabilities, experience, and perspectives on continuous processing in the pharmaceutical sector, with respondents from both pharmaceutical companies and Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs). The survey includes staffing (personnel), chemistry, reaction platforms, postreaction processing, analytical, regulatory, and factors that influence the adoption of continuous manufacturing. The results of the survey demonstrate that the industry has been increasing, and will continue to increase, the portion of total manufacturing executed as continuous processes with a decrease in batch processing. In general, most of the experience with continuous processing on scale have been enabling reaction chemistry, while postprocessing and analytical remain in the very early stages of development and implementation.

The development of reactions in a continuous fashion in plug flow tube reactors (PFR) offers unique advantages to the drug development and scale-up process and can also enable chemistry that would be difficult to perform via batch processing. Herein, we report the development of two different continuous flow approaches to a key 1H-4-substituted imidazole intermediate ( 5). In a first generation approach, rapid optimization and scale-up of a challenging cyclization reaction was demonstrated in a PFR under GMP conditions to afford 29 kg of protected product 2. This material was further processed in batch equipment to deliver di-HCl salt 4. This first generation approach highlights the rapid development of chemistry in research-scale PFRs and speed to material delivery through linear scale up to a pilot-scale PFR under GMP conditions. In a second generation effort, a more efficient synthetic route was developed, and PFRs with automated sampling, dilution, and analytical analysis allowed for rapid and data-rich reaction optimization of both a key cyclization reaction and thermal removal of a Boc protecting group. This work culminated in 1 kg demonstration runs in a 0.22 L PFR for both continuous steps and shows the potential of commercialization from a lab hood footprint (1−2 MT/year).

Flow chemistry has become a vibrant area for research over the past decade. This perspective is intended to capture insights on how these advances have and will continue to impact the development and commercialization of active pharmaceutical ingredients. A series of chemistry examples from a number of pharmaceutical companies will highlight the influence of flow chemistry on this industry.