This study demonstrated that severity of DPN symptoms was predictive of poor health-related utility and decreased quality of life. Furthermore, it provides detailed utility data for economic evaluation of treatment of typical diabetes-related morbidity states. Reducing DPN morbidity should be a priority.

It is well documented that diabetic foot ulceration contributes to increased morbidity and mortality associated with renal replacement therapy. Much less is known about the risk of foot ulceration and lower limb amputation in the non-diabetic dialysis population. The aim of this study was to determine if the prevalence of risks factors for lower limb amputation in a stable haemodialysis population was greater in the diabetic cohort compared with the non-diabetic cohort. The study design is a prospective observational cohort study. Sixty patients attending a satellite haemodialysis unit in Cardiff were invited to have a comprehensive foot assessment as part of a Podiatry service review. The medical notes and hospital information system were used to identify the diabetic cohort. Patients were classified according to diabetic status (diabetic versus non-diabetic). The Renal Foot Screening Tool was developed to prospectively identify risk factors associated with foot ulceration. The assessment included peripheral neuropathy (PN), peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and foot pathology (FP). Fifty-seven patients gave informed verbal consent prior to inclusion. Risk factors for foot ulceration were recorded at baseline in the diabetic (n = 24) and non-diabetic (n = 33) groups and mortality data was revisited after a 3-year period. FP was identified in 79% of patients. Eighteen per cent of the non-diabetic patients had PN. PAD was identified in 45% of diabetic and 30% of non-diabetic patients. Forty-nine per cent of the total cohort had ≥2 of the 3 independent risk factors for foot ulceration (16/24 diabetic versus 12/33 non-diabetic). The presence of PAD and PN was predictive of mortality independent of age. The limitations of this study are its small sample size and patients were from a single satellite dialysis unit. There was a high prevalence of risk factors for foot ulceration in this population, which were not confined to the diabetic cohort. These findings suggest that non-diabetic patients on haemodialysis therapy are also at risk of developing foot ulceration. Further work on strategies to monitor and prevent FP in this high-risk cohort is needed to minimize morbidity and mortality associated with foot ulceration.

This study demonstrated that severity of DPN symptoms was associated with increased healthcare resource use, thus costs.

AimsDeciding if a diabetic foot ulcer is infected in a community setting is challenging without validated point‐of‐care tests. Four inflammatory biomarkers were investigated to develop a composite algorithm for mildly infected diabetic foot ulcers: venous white cell count, C‐reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin, and a novel wound exudate calprotectin assay. Calprotectin is a marker of neutrophilic inflammation.MethodsIn a prospective study, people with uninfected or mildly infected diabetic foot ulcers who had not received oral antibiotics in the preceding 2 weeks were recruited from community podiatry clinics for measurement of inflammatory biomarkers. Antibiotic prescribing decisions were based on clinicians’ baseline assessments and participants were reviewed 1 week later; ulcer infection was defined by clinicians’ overall impression from their two assessments.ResultsSome 363 potential participants were screened, of whom 67 were recruited, 29 with mildly infected diabetic foot ulcers and 38 with no infection. One participant withdrew early in each group. Ulcer area was 1.32 cm2 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.32–3.61 cm2] in infected ulcers and 0.22 cm2 (IQR 0.09–1.46 cm2) in uninfected ulcers. Baseline CRP for mild infection was 9.00 mg/ml and 6.00 mg/ml for uninfected ulcers; most procalcitonin levels were undetectable. Median calprotectin level in infected diabetic foot ulcers was 1437 ng/ml and 879 ng/ml in uninfected diabetic foot ulcers. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for a composite algorithm incorporating calprotectin, CRP, white cell count and ulcer area was 0.68 (95% confidence intervals 0.52–0.82), sensitivity 0.64, specificity 0.81.ConclusionsA composite algorithm including CRP, calprotectin, white cell count and ulcer area may help to distinguish uninfected from mildly infected diabetic foot ulcers. Venous procalcitonin is unhelpful for mild diabetic foot ulcer infection.

The Objective was to develop and validate a quicker and more reliable method of assessing for peripheral arterial disease within the primary care setting.