Iron (hydr)oxides not only serve as potent sorbents and repositories for nutrients and contaminants but also provide a terminal electron acceptor for microbial respiration. The microbial reduction of Fe (hydr)oxides and the subsequent secondary solid-phase transformations will, therefore, have a profound influence on the biogeochemical cycling of Fe as well as associated metals. Here we elucidate the pathways and mechanisms of secondary mineralization during dissimilatory iron reduction by a common iron-reducing bacterium, Shewanella putrefaciens (strain CN32), of 2-line ferrihydrite under advective flow conditions. Secondary mineralization of ferrihydrite occurs via a coupled, biotic-abiotic pathway primarily resulting in the production of magnetite and goethite with minor amounts of green rust. Operating mineralization pathways are driven by competing abiotic reactions of bacterially generated ferrous iron with the ferrihydrite surface. Subsequent to the initial sorption of ferrous iron on ferrihydrite, goethite (via dissolution/reprecipitation) and/or magnetite (via solid-state conversion) precipitation ensues resulting in the spatial coupling of both goethite and magnetite with the ferrihydrite surface. The distribution of goethite and magnetite within the column is dictated, in large part, by flow-induced ferrous Fe profiles. While goethite precipitation occurs over a large Fe(II) concentration range, magnetite accumulation is only observed at concentrations exceeding 0.3 mmol/L (equivalent to 0.5 mmol Fe[II]/g ferrihydrite) following 16 d of reaction. Consequently, transportregulated ferrous Fe profiles result in a progression of magnetite levels downgradient within the column. Declining microbial reduction over time results in lower Fe(II) concentrations and a subsequent shift in magnetite precipitation mechanisms from nucleation to crystal growth. While the initial precipitation rate of goethite exceeds that of magnetite, continued growth is inhibited by magnetite formation, potentially a result of lower Fe(III) activity. Conversely, the presence of lower initial Fe(II) concentrations followed by higher concentrations promotes goethite accumulation and inhibits magnetite precipitation even when Fe(II) concentrations later increase, thus revealing the importance of both the rate of Fe(II) generation and flow-induced Fe(II) profiles. As such, the operating secondary mineralization pathways following reductive dissolution of ferrihydrite at a given pH are governed principally by flow-regulated Fe(II) concentration, which drives mineral precipitation kinetics and selection of competing mineral pathways.

Owing to its high surface area and intrinsic reactivity, ferrihydrite serves as a dominant sink for numerous metals and nutrients in surface environments and is a potentially important terminal electron acceptor for microbial respiration. Introduction of Fe (II), by reductive dissolution of Fe(III) minerals, for example, converts ferrihydrite to Fe phases varying in their retention and reducing capacity. While Fe(II) concentration is the master variable dictating secondary mineralization pathways of ferrihydrite, here we reveal thatthe kinetics of conversion and ultimate mineral assemblage are a function of competing mineralization pathways influenced by pH and stabilizing ligands. Reaction of Fe(II) with ferrihydrite results in the precipitation of goethite, lepidocrocite, and magnetite. The three phases vary in their precipitation extent, rate, and residence time, all of which are primarily a function of Fe(II) concentration and ligand type (Cl, SO4, CO3). While lepidocrocite and goethite precipitate over a large Fe(II) concentration range, magnetite accumulation is only observed at surface loadings greater than 1.0 mmol Fe(II)/g ferrihydrite (in the absence of bicarbonate). Precipitation of magnetite induces the dissolution of lepidocrocite (presence of Cl) or goethite (presence of SO4), allowing for Fe(III)-dependent crystal growth. The rate of magnetite precipitation is a function of the relative proportions of goethite to lepidocrocite; the lower solubility of the former Fe (hydr)oxide slows magnetite precipitation. A one unit pH deviation from 7, however, either impedes (pH 6) or enhances (pH 8) magnetite precipitation. In the absence of magnetite nucleation, lepidocrocite and goethite continue to precipitate at the expense of ferrihydrite with near complete conversion within hours, the relative proportions of the two hydroxides dependent upon the ligand present. Goethite also continues to precipitate at the expense of lepidocrocite in the absence of chloride. In fact, the rate and extent of both goethite and magnetite precipitation are influenced by conditions conducive to the production and stability of lepidocrocite. Thus, predicting the secondary mineralization of ferrihydrite, a process having sweeping influences on contaminant/nutrient dynamics, will need to take into consideration kinetic restraints and transient precursor phases (e.g., lepidocrocite) that influence ensuing reaction pathways.

Over the past few decades, groundwater wells installed in rural areas throughout the major river basins draining the Himalayas have become the main source of drinking water for tens of millions of people. Groundwater in this region is much less likely to contain microbial pathogens than surface water but often contains hazardous amounts of arsenic--a known carcinogen. Arsenic enters groundwater naturally from rocks and sediment by coupled biogeochemical and hydrologic processes, some of which are presently affected by human activity. Mitigation of the resulting health crisis in South and Southeast Asia requires an understanding of the transport of arsenic and key reactants such as organic carbon that could trigger release in zones with presently low groundwater arsenic levels.

., "Arsenic(III) Oxidation and Arsenic(V) Adsorption Reactions on Synthetic Birnessite" (2002). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 503. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/503 The oxidation of arsenite (As(III)) by manganese oxide is an important reaction in both the natural cycling of As and the development of remediation technology for lowering the concentration of dissolved As(III) in drinking water. This study used both a conventional stirred reaction apparatus and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy to investigate the reactions of As(III) and As(V) with synthetic birnessite (MnO 2 ). Stirred reactor experiments indicate that As(III) is oxidized by MnO 2 followed by the adsorption of the As(V) reaction product on the MnO 2 solid phase. The As(V)-Mn interatomic distance determined by EXAFS analysis for both As(III)-and As(V)-treated MnO 2 was 3.22 Å, giving evidence for the formation of As(V) adsorption complexes on MnO 2 crystallite surfaces. The most likely As(V)-MnO 2 complex is a bidentate binuclear corner sharing (bridged) complex occurring at MnO 2 crystallite edges and interlayer domains. In the As(III)-treated MnO 2 systems, reductive dissolution of the MnO 2 solid during the oxidation of As(III) caused an increase in the adsorption of As(V) when compared with As(V)-treated MnO 2 . This suggested that As(III) oxidation caused a surface alteration, creating fresh reaction sites for As(V) on MnO 2 surfaces. Arsenic(III) Oxidation and Arsenic(V) Adsorption Reactions on Synthetic Birnessite