No abstract

Background: Rural rotations can be a valuable experience for emergency medicine (EM) residents. To date, there has not been a retrospective cohort study comparing procedures performed at urban versus rural emergency departments (EDs). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare procedures performed by EM residents in urban versus rural EDs, with the hypothesis that there will be no significant difference in the procedures performed. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted comparing procedures performed by second- and third-year EM residents based on medical chart review. The procedures were counted at three locations in West Virginia, including a small rural ED, a large rural ED, and a tertiary care ED. Procedure notes were collected from September 2018 to September 2019. The final analysis included nine months, as three months did not have residents at all locations. Eight procedures were standardized based on the number of procedures performed per 100 hours worked by residents. A comparison of total procedures and complex versus simple procedures was performed. A Kruskal-Wallis H test was performed to compare resident hours for procedures between each of the three locations. To compare each of the hospitals to one another separately, Mann-Whitney U tests were performed. Results: The total resident hours worked included 1,800 at the small rural ED, 13,725.5 at the tertiary care ED, and 5,319 at the large rural ED. A p-value of 0.0311 for the Kruskal-Wallis H Test indicated a difference between at least two of the ED sites. A statistically significant difference exists (p-value = 0.0135) between the urban ED (95% CI: 0.15-0.62) and the large rural ED (95% CI: 0.54-1.53). There was no significant difference in complex versus simple procedures among the three locations (p-value = 0.4159). Conclusions: When compared with the tertiary care ED, residents performed more total procedures at the large rural ED and similar total procedure numbers at the small rural ED when standardized for hours worked. There was no significant difference when comparing complex and simple procedures among the three locations.

No abstract

The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) Mountain Bike World Cup in 2019 provided unique challenges for effective prehospital care. While on-site medical care has demonstrated improved outcomes along with reduced emergency department and emergency medical services (EMS) utilization, this aspect has not been well documented in the literature with respect to rural mass gathering events (MGEs). Conducted at a large mass gathering event in a geographically isolated area, this study aimed to assess the medical needs at this specific event and will hopefully assist in future coordination of similar events. All patients who were treated at the event clinic were included in the analysis. Primary investigators collected and recorded data while providing care. We believe the on-site clinic was successful in reducing barriers to healthcare by improving access, streamlining the treatment process, and optimizing resource utilization. This benefit extended to race participants, support staff, spectators, and the local EMS system.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is exposing the fragility of health care in rural areas of the US. The pandemic-related hospital financial crisis may exacerbate the long-standing rural hospital closure crisis, worsening preexisting rural health disparities. 1 COVID-19 is spreading in a "checkerboard" pattern through hot spots in rural areas. Rural health care facilities have undergone