To examine the long-term productivity, profitability, and ecological interactions associated with whole farming systems, we established an interdisciplinary replicated comparison of a conventional and an experimental alternative crop-livestock farming system in southwest Virginia in 1988. The conventional system uses the best management practices commonly used in the mid-Atlantic region. The alternative system puts more emphasis on crop rotation, grazing and forage management, conservation tillage, cover crops, and integrated pest management. Each is managed as a year-round system, with management decisions based on the system's overall goals.The comparison is planned to run for 10 years, so that only preliminary conclusions can be drawn so far. These include the following: 1) similar total productivity can be achieved with either reduced or full use of herbicides and insecticides; 2) the need for N fertilization can be decreased using grazing management and short-rotation alfalfa; and 3) recycling of manure from cattle fed corn silage provides most nutrients needed for the following corn crop. The comparative profitability of the two systems has fluctuated among years, and it is too early to know which system is more profitable. The process of interdisciplinary systems research has increased our knowledge of total system interactions, challenged prior assumptions, and clarified the methodological problems of integrated systems research.
The combination of florpyrauxifen-benzyl + 2,4-D is a new pre-packaged herbicide mixture for use in pastures and hayfields in the United States. Unlike many other pasture herbicides, florpyrauxifen-benzyl + 2,4-D is reported to preserve white clover. However, there is limited research on the efficacy of florpyrauxifen-benzyl + 2,4-D on common weed species as well as the level of tolerance of white clover. Field trials were conducted across Virginia in 2018-20 to evaluate control of various broadleaf weeds with florpyrauxifen-benzyl + 2,4-D compared to other commonly used herbicides as well as field and greenhouse studies assessing white clover tolerance. Weed species evaluated included: bulbous buttercup, Canada thistle, horsenettle, and broadleaf plantain. Florpyrauxifen-benzyl + 2,4-D provided 75 to 99% control of all weeds 90 days after application except for horsenettle (56%), while causing the least white clover injury of any herbicide treatment evaluated. Across treatments, spring herbicide applications resulted in greater bulbous buttercup control compared to fall applications, but florpyrauxifen-benzyl + 2,4-D resulted in greater than 81% control from both application timings. There were no differences in above ground biomass between white clover varieties, however all herbicides reduced white clover biomass compared to the nontreated. This research suggests that florpyrauxifen-benzyl + 2,4-D can improve overall forage quality by controlling broadleaf weeds in mixed grass-legume stands while preserving white clover.
The hull of any FPSO not only provides the platform for the production facilities and accommodation, but also incorporates the storage and offloading facilities for the field (and potentially other fields). As such the hull acts as a vital "hub", critical to both the operation and export chain. For FPSO's (like ships) there already exists an "experience based" prescriptive regime for integrity management of the hull structure (Class). This, however is based upon maintaining a minimum standard for a forecast window of only 2.5 to 5 years as per a trading oil tanker where opportunities to drydock the hull to carry out inspections and any required maintenance can easily be accommodated. Adopting this approach without due consideration of the constraints of FPSO operations imports a significant risk to the viability of an asset and does not guarantee the avoidance of having to go to dry-dock. Understanding the potential dangers of unquestioningly following Class rules and requirements, Hess have sought to adopt an alternative risk based approach to mitigate the risks to both integrity and operational functionality by proactively understanding the condition and limitations of the hull structure, putting in place an appropriate level of inspection, having robust assessment criteria and implementing increased inspection regimes or undertaking appropriate repairs to deficiencies identified in the hull structure. This paper presents the journey travelled by Hess from prescriptive Class rules to a risk based Class regime from the period 2006 to present. It will describe the asset; discuss Class rules and a risk based approach to integrity; and then describe how these are applied to the FPSO Sendje Ceiba. Hess Equatorial Guinea Overview Hess Equatorial Guinea operates the Ceiba and Okume Field developments. The Ceiba Field is comprised of subsea well clusters producing to FPSO Sendje Ceiba where the production is processed, stored and then offloaded through a CALM buoy. This field commenced production in 2000 and the license to operate expires in 2029. The Okume Field consists of 4 bottom founded platforms and 2 mini-TLP's. Okume production is fully processed prior to being exported via a 20 km pipeline to FPSO Sendje Ceiba for storage and offloading. This field commenced production in 2006 and the operating license will expire in 2032. Combined production from the two developments peaked at approximately 120,000 BPD and is currently in the range of 90,000 BPD. The FPSO serves as the storage and export terminal for both the Ceiba and Okume developments with an effective crude oil storage capacity of 1.78 million barrels. Liftings (sales) are made in 1 million barrel parcels. These developments are located offshore of the city of Bata which is located on the West African mainland just north of the equator as shown in Figure 1 below. The equatorial location of the developments results in a very benign operating environment devoid of named storms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.