Atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment (eCO 2) can enhance plant carbon uptake and growth 1,2,3,4,5 , thereby providing an important negative feedback to climate change by slowing the rate of increase of the atmospheric CO 2 concentration 6. While evidence gathered from young aggrading forests has generally indicated a strong CO 2 fertilization effect on biomass growth 3,4,5 , it is unclear whether mature forests respond to eCO 2 in a similar way. In mature trees and forest stands 7,8,9,10 , photosynthetic uptake has been found to increase under eCO 2 without any apparent accompanying growth response, leaving an open question about the fate of additional carbon fixed under eCO 2 4,5,7,8,9,10,11. Here, using data from the first ecosystemscale Free-Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) experiment in a mature forest, we constructed a comprehensive ecosystem carbon budget to track the fate of carbon as the forest responds to four years of eCO 2 exposure. We show that, although the eCO 2 treatment of ambient +150 ppm (+38%) induced a 12% (+247 g C m-2 yr-1) increase in carbon uptake through gross primary production, this additional carbon uptake did not lead to increased carbon sequestration at the ecosystem level. Instead, the majority of the extra carbon was emitted back into the atmosphere via several respiratory fluxes, with increased soil respiration alone accounting for ~50% of the total uptake surplus. Our results call into question the predominant thinking that the capacity of forests to act as carbon sinks will be generally enhanced under eCO 2 , and challenge the efficacy of climate mitigation strategies that rely on ubiquitous CO 2 fertilization as a driver of increased carbon sinks in global forests. Main text Globally, forests act as a large carbon sink, absorbing a significant portion of the anthropogenic CO 2 emissions 1,12 , an ecosystem service that has tremendous social and

AbstractAtmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment (eCO2) can enhance plant carbon uptake and growth1,2,3,4,5, thereby providing an important negative feedback to climate change by slowing the rate of increase of the atmospheric CO2 concentration6. While evidence gathered from young aggrading forests has generally indicated a strong CO2 fertilization effect on biomass growth3,4,5, it is unclear whether mature forests respond to eCO2 in a similar way. In mature trees and forest stands7,8,9,10, photosynthetic uptake has been found to increase under eCO2 without any apparent accompanying growth response, leaving an open question about the fate of additional carbon fixed under eCO24, 5, 7,8,9,10,11. Here, using data from the first ecosystem-scale Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiment in a mature forest, we constructed a comprehensive ecosystem carbon budget to track the fate of carbon as the forest responds to four years of eCO2 exposure. We show that, although the eCO2 treatment of ambient +150 ppm (+38%) induced a 12% (+247 gCm-2yr-1) increase in carbon uptake through gross primary production, this additional carbon uptake did not lead to increased carbon sequestration at the ecosystem level. Instead, the majority of the extra carbon was emitted back into the atmosphere via several respiratory fluxes, with increased soil respiration alone contributing ∼50% of the total uptake surplus. Our results call into question the predominant thinking that the capacity of forests to act as carbon sinks will be generally enhanced under eCO2, and challenge the efficacy of climate mitigation strategies that rely on CO2 fertilization as a driver of increased carbon sinks in standing forests and afforestation projects.

Grasses accumulate large amounts of silicon (Si) which is deposited in trichomes, specialised silica cells and cell walls. This may increase leaf toughness and reduce cell rupture, palatability and digestion. Few studies have measured leaf mechanical traits in response to Si, thus the effect of Si on herbivores can be difficult to disentangle from Si-induced changes in leaf surface morphology. We assessed the effects of Si on Brachypodium distachyon mechanical traits (specific leaf area (SLA), thickness, leaf dry matter content (LDMC), relative electrolyte leakage (REL)) and leaf surface morphology (macrohairs, prickle, silica and epidermal cells) and determined the effects of Si on the growth of two generalist insect herbivores (Helicoverpa armigera and Acheta domesticus). Si had no effect on leaf mechanical traits; however, Si changed leaf surface morphology: silica and prickle cells were on average 127% and 36% larger in Si supplemented plants, respectively. Prickle cell density was significantly reduced by Si, while macrohair density remained unchanged. Caterpillars were more negatively affected by Si compared to crickets, possibly due to the latter having a thicker and thus more protective gut lining. Our data show that Si acts as a direct defence against leaf-chewing insects by changing the morphology of specialised defence structures without altering leaf mechanical traits.

Silicon (Si) has been widely reported to improve plant resistance to water stress via various mechanisms including cuticular Si deposition to reduce leaf transpiration. However, there is limited understanding of the effects of Si on stomatal physiology, including the underlying mechanisms and implications for resistance to water stress. We grew tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb. cv. Fortuna) hydroponically, with or without Si, and treated half of the plants with 20% polyethylene glycol to impose physiological drought (osmotic stress). Scanning electron microscopy in conjunction with X‐ray mapping found that Si was deposited on stomatal guard cells and as a sub‐cuticular layer in Si‐treated plants. Plants grown in Si had a 28% reduction in stomatal conductance and a 23% reduction in cuticular conductance. When abscisic acid was applied exogenously to epidermal leaf peels to promote stomatal closure, Si plants had 19% lower stomatal aperture compared to control plants (i.e. increased stomatal sensitivity) and an increased efflux of guard cell K+ ions. However, the changes in stomatal physiology with Si were not substantial enough to improve water stress resistance, as shown by a lack of significant effect of Si on water potential, growth, photosynthesis and water‐use efficiency. Our findings suggest a novel underlying mechanism for reduced stomatal conductance with Si application; specifically, that Si deposition on stomatal guard cells promotes greater stomatal sensitivity as mediated by guard cell K+ efflux.

Many studies have examined aboveground herbivory as it relates to primary production and nutrient dynamics (Mattson and Addy, 1975; Ritchie, 1998; Hunter, 2001a). However, studies of belowground herbivory are largely lacking (Hunter, 2001b) even though belowground productivity, albeit much less conspicuous, is comparable to aboveground productivity (Newman et al., 2006). In forests, conservative estimates indicate that fine roots (≤2 mm in diameter) alone represent 33% of global annual net primary productivity (NPP) (Jackson et al., 1997), and as much as 73% of total NPP may occur belowground in some systems (Fogel, 1985). Fine-root NPP was estimated at >2 Mg ha −1 year −1 in a deciduous hardwood stand in the Adirondack Mountains (Burke and Raynal, 1994), and exceeded 4 Mg ha −1 year −1 in sugar maple, Acer saccharum, stands in Wisconsin (Aber et al., 1985). Average belowground NPP is 7 Mg ha −1 year −1 in temperate forest systems (Burrows et al., 2003). Belowground herbivory can have numerous effects at scales of individual plant roots and shoots, plant communities and ecosystems (see Blackshaw and Kerry, Seastedt and Murray, Hunter and Johnson et al., Chapters 3, 4, 5 and 9, respectively, this volume). Root feeders often decrease the belowground biomass and alter the physiology of their host plant, and may exert a significant influence on primary production (Detling et al., 1980). Stevens et al. (2002) proposed root herbivory as the leading explanation for 37% fineroot mortality in a longleaf pine, Pinus palustris Miller, stand. Consistent with this hypothesis, an insecticidal soil drench increased fine-root longevity by up to 125 days, and decreased fine-root mortality by as much as 41% in peach, Prunus persica Batsch, trees (Wells et al., 2002).