No abstract

Information acquisition to extend understanding of each individual before proceeding with documentation of advance care planning is essential and should include retrieval of individuals' cultural and religious beliefs and values, and preferences for care. An institutional system and/or protocol that promote conversations about these among nurses and other healthcare professionals are warranted.

Nursing professionals are provided with an opportunity to improve their practice to meet the needs of older persons and their families in planning ahead for future treatment options.

Objective To investigate if an innovative clinical pathway for managing child and adolescent mental health (MH) ED presentations reduces average length of stay (LOS) and improves carer satisfaction. Methods An intervention feasibility study at an ED. Participants were 5–17 years olds presenting with MH problems and their carers. ED medical officer (MO) led Kids Assessment Liaison for Mental Health (KALM) clinical pathway was implemented as an intervention and it was compared to Care as Usual pathway which involved ED MO and MH clinicians. Data were collected via the ED clinical data system and a carer survey. Data were analysed by using SAS v9.4 (SAS, Cary, NC, USA). Survey was compared using Fisher's exact test and LOS was compared using median quantile regression. Results Fifty (23%) patients used the KALM pathway and 169 (77%) the Care as Usual pathway. The median (min, max) LOS in hours for those on the KALM pathway was 4.13 (0.46, 11.55) compared to 5.09 (0.21, 19.12) for Care as Usual pathway (P = 0.1407). Fewer patients breached the National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) when the KALM pathway was used (56%, n = 28 vs 64%, n = 108, P = 0.252). There were no significant differences in the carer survey between the two care pathways. Conclusion This study provides valuable information about the benefits of the KALM pathway in managing child and adolescent MH presentations to ED. This new pathway reduces the LOS in ED and improves carer experience compared to the usual care pathway.

No abstract