No abstract

No abstract

As the high performance computing (HPC) community continues to push for ever larger machines, reliability remains a serious obstacle. Further, as feature size and voltages decrease, the rate of transient soft errors is on the rise. HPC programmers of today have to deal with these faults to a small degree and it is expected this will only be a larger problem as systems continue to scale.In this paper we present SEFI, the Soft Error Fault Injection framework, a tool for profiling software for its susceptibility to soft errors. In particular, we focus in this paper on logic soft error injection. Using the open source virtual machine and processor emulator (QEMU), we demonstrate modifying emulated machine instructions to introduce soft errors. We conduct experiments by modifying the virtual machine itself in a way that does not require intimate knowledge of the tested application. With this technique, we show that we are able to inject simulated soft errors in the logic operations of a target application without affecting other applications or the operating system sharing the VM. We present some initial results and discuss where we think this work will be useful in next generation hardware/software co-design.

No abstract

We present an in-depth analysis of transient faults effects on HPC applications in Intel Xeon Phi processors based on radiation experiments and high-level fault injection. Besides measuring the realistic error rates of Xeon Phi, we quantify Silent Data Corruption (SDCs) by correlating the distribution of corrupted elements in the output to the application's characteristics. We evaluate the benefits of imprecise computing for reducing the programs' error rate. For example, for HotSpot a 0.5% tolerance in the output value reduces the error rate by 85%.We inject different fault models to analyze the sensitivity of given applications. We show that portions of applications can be graded by different criticalities. For example, faults occurring in the middle of LUD execution, or in the Sort and Tree portions of CLAMR, are more critical than the remaining portions. Mitigation techniques can then be relaxed or hardened based on the criticality of the particular portions.