ObjectivesThis study reports preliminary findings on the prevalence of, and factors associated with, mental health and well-being outcomes of healthcare workers during the early months (April–June) of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.MethodsPreliminary cross-sectional data were analysed from a cohort study (n=4378). Clinical and non-clinical staff of three London-based NHS Trusts, including acute and mental health Trusts, took part in an online baseline survey. The primary outcome measure used is the presence of probable common mental disorders (CMDs), measured by the General Health Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are probable anxiety (seven-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder), depression (nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (six-item Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder checklist), suicidal ideation (Clinical Interview Schedule) and alcohol use (Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test). Moral injury is measured using the Moray Injury Event Scale.ResultsAnalyses showed substantial levels of probable CMDs (58.9%, 95% CI 58.1 to 60.8) and of PTSD (30.2%, 95% CI 28.1 to 32.5) with lower levels of depression (27.3%, 95% CI 25.3 to 29.4), anxiety (23.2%, 95% CI 21.3 to 25.3) and alcohol misuse (10.5%, 95% CI 9.2 to 11.9). Women, younger staff and nurses tended to have poorer outcomes than other staff, except for alcohol misuse. Higher reported exposure to moral injury (distress resulting from violation of one’s moral code) was strongly associated with increased levels of probable CMDs, anxiety, depression, PTSD symptoms and alcohol misuse.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that mental health support for healthcare workers should consider those demographics and occupations at highest risk. Rigorous longitudinal data are needed in order to respond to the potential long-term mental health impacts of the pandemic.

Interprofessional, in situ simulation training for medical deterioration yielded promising outcomes for individuals and teams. Simulation is an under-used training modality in mental health, offering a holistic training approach with the potential to provide educational and clinical benefits while supporting workforce resilience.

CONTEXT: Most medical doctors are likely to work with patients experiencing mental health conditions. However, there are often limited educational opportunities for medical doctors to achieve professional development in the field of psychiatry. Simulation training in psychiatry may be a useful tool to foster this development. OBJECTIVES:To assess the effectiveness of simulation training in psychiatry for medical students, post-graduate trainees, and medical doctors. METHODS:For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched 8 electronic databases and trial registries up to August 31, 2018. We manually searched key journals and the reference lists of selected studies. We included randomised and non-randomised controlled studies and single group prepost-test studies. Our main outcomes were based on Kirkpatrick levels. We included data only from Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) using random-effects models. RESULTS:From 46 571 studies identified, we selected 163 studies and combined 27 RCTs. Interventions included simulation by role-play (n=69), simulated patients (n=72), virtual reality (n=22), manikin (n=5) and voice simulation (n=2). Meta-analysis found significant differences at immediate post-test for simulation compared with active and inactive controls on attitudes (SMD=0.52 (95%CI 0.31; 0.73; I 2 = 0%) and 0.28 (95%CI 0.04; 0.53; I 2 = 52%), respectively); on skills (SMD=1.37 (95%CI 0.56; 2.18; I 2 =93%) and 1.49 (95%CI 0.39; 2.58; I 2 = 93%), respectively); on knowledge (SMD=1.22 (95%CI 0.57; 1.88; I 2 = 0%) and 0.72 (95%CI 0.14; 1.30; I 2 = 80%), respectively); and on behaviours (SMD= 1.07 (95%CI 0.49; 1.65; I 2 =68%) and 0.45 (95%CI 0.11; 0.79; I 2 =41%), respectively. Significant differences were found at three-month follow-up for patient benefit and doctors' behaviours and skills. CONCLUSIONS: Despite heterogeneity in methods and simulation interventions, our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of simulation training in psychiatry training.

Combative sport is one of the most physically intense forms of exercise, yet the effect of recovery interventions has been largely unexplored. We investigated the effect of cold-water immersion on structural, inflammatory, and physiological stress biomarkers following a mixed martial arts (MMA) contest preparation training session in comparison with passive recovery. Semiprofessional MMA competitors (n = 15) were randomly assigned to a cold-water immersion (15 min at 10 °C) or passive recovery protocol (ambient air) completed immediately following a contest preparation training session. Markers of muscle damage (urinary myoglobin), inflammation/oxidative stress (urinary neopterin + total neopterin (neopterin + 7,8-dihydroneopterin)), and hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA) activation (saliva cortisol) were determined before, immediately after, and 1, 2, and 24 h postsession. Ratings of perceived soreness and fatigue, counter movement jump, and gastrointestinal temperature were also measured. Concentrations of all biomarkers increased significantly (p < 0.05) postsession. Cold water immersion attenuated increases in urinary neopterin (p < 0.05, d = 0.58), total neopterin (p < 0.05, d = 0.89), and saliva cortisol after 2 h (p < 0.05, d = 0.68) and urinary neopterin again at 24 h (p < 0.01, d = 0.57) in comparison with passive recovery. Perceived soreness, fatigue, and gastrointestinal temperatures were also lower for the cold-water immersion group at several time points postsession whilst counter movement jump did not differ. Combative sport athletes who are subjected to impact-induced stress may benefit from immediate cold-water immersion as a simple recovery intervention that reduces delayed onset muscle soreness as well as macrophage and HPA activation whilst not impairing functional performance.