Peritubular capillary C4d staining in allograft kidney is an important criterion for antibody-mediated rejection. Whether BK virus infection can result in complement activation is not known. We studied 113 renal allograft biopsies from 52 recipients with a history of BK virus activation. The samples were classified into four groups according to the concurrent detection of BK virus DNA in urine, plasma, and/or biopsy: BK-negative (n ¼ 37), viruria (n ¼ 53), viremia (n ¼ 7), and nephropathy (n ¼ 16) groups. The histological semiquantitative peritubular capillary C4d scores in the viremia (0.3 ± 0.8) and BK nephropathy (0.6 ± 0.9) groups were lower than those in the BK-negative group (1.2±1.1, P ¼ 0.05 and P ¼ 0.06, respectively) and the viruria group (1.2±1.1, P ¼ 0.04 and P ¼ 0.06, respectively). Diffuse or focal peritubular capillary C4d staining was present in 9/76 (12%) and 14/76 (19%) of all samples with concurrent BK virus reactivation (viruria, viremia, and nephropathy). The diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection could be established in 7/9 (78%) and 5/14 (36%) of these samples, respectively. Diffuse tubular basement membrane C4d staining was restricted to BK nephropathy cases (4/16, 25%). Semiquantitative tubular basement membrane C4d scores were higher in BK nephropathy (1.2 ± 1.3) compared with BK-negative (0.05 ± 0.3, P ¼ 0.017) and viruria (0.0 ± 0.0, P ¼ 0.008) groups. Bowman's capsule C4d staining was more frequent in BK nephropathy (5/16) compared with the aforementioned groups (2/36 (P ¼ 0.023) and 4/51 (P ¼ 0.03), respectively). Within the BK nephropathy group, samples with tubular basement membrane stain had more infected tubular epithelial cells (12.1 ± 7.6% vs 4.4 ± 5.0%, P ¼ 0.03) and a trend toward higher interstitial inflammation scores. In conclusion, peritubular capillary C4d staining remains a valid marker for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in the presence of concurrent BK virus infection. A subset of biopsies with BK nephropathy shows tubular basement membrane C4d staining, which correlates with marked viral cytopathic effect.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.