Bone is a remarkable, living tissue that functionally adapts to external loading. Therefore, bone shape and internal structure carry information relevant to many disciplines, including medicine, forensic science, and anthropology. However, morphometric comparisons of homologous regions across different individuals or groups are still challenging. In this study, two methods were combined to quantify such differences: (1) Holistic morphometric analysis (HMA) was used to quantify morphometric values in each bone, (2) which could then be mapped to a volumetric mesh of a canonical bone created by a statistical free-form deformation model (SDM). Required parameters for this canonical holistic morphometric analysis (cHMA) method were identified and the robustness of the method was evaluated. The robustness studies showed that the SDM converged after one to two iterations, had only a marginal bias towards the chosen starting image, and could handle large shape differences seen in bones of different species. Case studies were performed on metacarpal bones and proximal femora of different primate species to confirm prior study results. The differences between species could be visualised and statistically analysed in both case studies. cHMA provides a framework for performing quantitative comparisons of different morphometric quantities across individuals or groups. These comparisons facilitate investigation of the relationship between spatial morphometric variations and function or pathology, or both.

Inverse bone (re)modeling (IBR) can infer physiological loading conditions from the bone microstructure. IBR scales unit loads, imposed on finite element (FE) models of a bone, such that the trabecular microstructure is homogeneously loaded and the difference to a target stimulus is minimized. Micro-FE (µFE) analyses are typically used to model the microstructure, but computationally more efficient, homogenized FE (hFE) models, where the microstructure is replaced by an equivalent continuum, could be used instead. However, also the target stimulus has to be translated from the tissue to the continuum level. In this study, a new continuum-level target stimulus relating relative bone density and strain energy density is proposed. It was applied using different types of hFE models to predict the physiological loading of 21 distal radii sections, which was subsequently compared to µFE-based IBR. The hFE models were able to correctly identify the dominant load direction and showed a high correlation of the predicted forces, but mean magnitude errors ranged from − 14.7 to 26.6% even for the best models. While µFE-based IBR can still be regarded as a gold standard, hFE-based IBR enables faster predictions, the usage of more sophisticated boundary conditions, and the usage of clinical images.

ObjectivesRecent studies have associated subarticular trabecular bone distribution in the extant hominid first metacarpal (Mc1) with observed thumb use, to infer fossil hominin thumb use. Here, we analyze the entire Mc1 to test for interspecific differences in: (1) the absolute volume of trabecular volume fraction, (2) the distribution of the deeper trabecular network, and (3) the distribution of trabeculae in the medullary cavity, especially beneath the Mc1 disto‐radial flange.Materials and MethodsTrabecular bone was imaged using micro‐computed tomography in a sample of Homo sapiens (n = 11), Pan paniscus (n = 10), Pan troglodytes (n = 11), Gorilla gorilla (n = 10) and Pongo sp., (n = 7). Using Canonical Holistic Morphometric Analysis (cHMA), we tested for interspecific differences in the trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and its relative distribution (rBV/TV) throughout the Mc1, including within the head, medullary cavity, and base.ResultsP. paniscus had the highest, and H. sapiens the lowest, BV/TV relative to other species. rBV/TV distribution statistically distinguished the radial concentrations and lack of medullary trabecular bone in the H. sapiens Mc1 from all other hominids. H. sapiens and, to a lesser extent, G. gorilla also had a significantly higher trabecular volume beneath the disto‐radial flange relative to other hominids.DiscussionThese results are consistent with differences in observed thumb use in these species and may also reflect systemic differences in bone volume fraction. The trabecular bone extension into the medullary cavity and concentrations beneath the disto‐radial flange may represent crucial biomechanical signals that will aid in the inference of fossil hominin thumb use.

No abstract