No abstract

Background: The most effective contacts in subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation are reported to be dorsolateral, and suppression of synchronized oscillatory activity might be a mechanism of action. Objectives: To analyze the optimal contact position in regard to the anatomical and electrophysiological position and to determine whether oscillatory and bursty activity is more frequent around the active contact. Methods: In 21 patients, the clinically most effective contacts were analyzed according to their relative position to the anatomical and electrophysiological STN center, which was assessed by T2-weighted MRI and microrecording. In 12 out of 21 consecutive patients, autocorrelograms of the action potentials within the vicinity of the active contact were compared to the most ventromedial reference contact. Results: The isocenter of the anatomical and electrophysiological STN had a mean deviation of 0.8 mm (SD 1.45). Thirty-two out of 42 active contacts were found dorsal to the anatomical isocenter of the STN. None of the active contacts were ventral to the STN. Synchronized oscillatory or bursty activity was found in 67% of the patients within the vicinity of the active contact. In 64% of the patients, the ventromedial reference contact showed irregular activity. Conclusions: Synchronized activity in the autocorrelogram correlates with the most effective contact. The optimal localization of the finally stimulated contact is dorsal to the STN isocenter.

We present our series of LDMs associated with dermoid elements and recommend excising the entire length of the intradural LDM stalk from its dural entry point to its merge point with the spinal cord during the initial treatment to avoid secondary deterioration and additional surgery.

The developmental error of this peculiar malformation probably occurs during the critical transition between the end of primary and the beginning of secondary neurulation, in a stage aptly called junctional neurulation. We describe the current knowledge concerning junctional neurulation and speculate on the embryogenesis of this new class of spinal dysraphism, which we call junctional neural tube defect.

Junctional neurulation represents the most recent adjunct to the well-known sequential embryological processes of primary and secondary neurulation. While its exact molecular processes, occurring at the end of primary and the beginning of secondary neurulation, are still being actively investigated, its pathological counterpart-junctional neural tube defect (JNTD)-had been described in 2017 based on three patients whose well-formed secondary neural tube, the conus, is widely separated from its corresponding primary neural tube and functionally disconnected from corticospinal control from above. Several other cases conforming to this bizarre neural tube arrangement have since appeared in the literature, reinforcing the validity of this entity. The cardinal clinical, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological features of JNTD, and the hypothesis of its embryogenetic mechanism, form part of this review.