IntroductionIntensive care unit (ICU) lengths of stay are modified by ongoing need for haemodynamic support in critically ill patients. This is most commonly provided by intravenous vasopressor therapy. Midodrine has been used as an oral agent for haemodynamic support in patients with orthostatic hypotension or cirrhosis. However, its efficacy in treating shock in the ICU, particularly for patients weaning from intravenous vasopressors, remains uncertain. The objective of this systematic review is to determine the efficacy of midodrine in vasopressor dependent shock.Methods and analysisWe will search Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library for observational trials and randomised controlled trials evaluating midodrine in critically ill patients from inception to 21 April 2022. We will also review unpublished data and relevant conference abstracts. Outcomes will include ICU length of stay, duration of intravenous vasopressor support, ICU mortality, hospital mortality, hospital length of stay and rates of ICU readmission. Data will be analysed in aggregate, where appropriate. We will evaluate risk of bias using the modified Cochrane tool and certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations methodology. We will perform trial sequential analysis for the outcome of ICU length of stay.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. Findings of this review will be disseminated through peer-related publication and will inform future clinical trials.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021260375.

Purpose: While opioids are part of usual care for analgesia in the intensive care unit (ICU), there are concerns regarding excess use. This is a systematic review of non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) use in critically ill adult patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. We included randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing NSAIDs alone or as an adjunct to opioids for analgesia. The primary outcome was opioid utilization. We reported mean difference for continuous outcomes and relative risk for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We evaluated study risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and evidence certainty using GRADE. Results: We included 15 RCTs (n=1621 patients). Adjunctive NSAID therapy to opioids reduced 24-hour oral morphine equivalent consumption by 21.4mg (95% CI: 11.8-31.0mg reduction, high certainty) and probably reduced pain scores (measured by visual analogue scale) by -6.1mm (95% CI: -12.2 to +0.1, moderate certainty). Adjunctive NSAIDs probably had no impact on duration of mechanical ventilation (-1.6 hours, 95% CI: -0.4 to -2.7 hours, moderate certainty) and may have no impact on ICU length of stay (-2.1 hours, 95% CI: -6.1 to +2.0 hours, low certainty). Variability in reporting of adverse outcomes (e.g. gastrointestinal bleeding, acute kidney injury) precluded their meta-analysis. Conclusion: In critically ill adult patients, NSAIDs reduced opioid use, probably reduced pain scores, but were uncertain for duration of mechanical ventilation or ICU length of stay. Further research is required to characterize the prevalence of NSAID-related adverse outcomes.

While opioids are part of usual care for analgesia in the ICU, there are concerns regarding excess use. This is a systematic review of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use in postoperative critical care adult patients. DATA SOURCES:We searched Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, trial registries, Google Scholar, and relevant systematic reviews through March 2023.STUDY SELECTION: Titles, abstracts, and full texts were reviewed independently and induplicate by two investigators to identify eligible studies. We included randomized control trials (RCTs) that compared NSAIDs alone or as an adjunct to opioids for systemic analgesia. The primary outcome was opioid utilization. DATA EXTRACTION:In duplicate, investigators independently extracted study characteristics, patient demographics, intervention details, and outcomes of interest using predefined abstraction forms. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager software Version 5.4. (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). DATA SYNTHESIS:We included 15 RCTs (n = 1,621 patients) for admission to the ICU for postoperative management after elective procedures. Adjunctive NSAID therapy to opioids reduced 24-hour oral morphine equivalent consumption by 21.4 mg (95% CI, 11.8-31.0 mg reduction; high certainty) and probably reduced pain scores (measured by Visual Analog Scale) by 6.1 mm (95% CI, 12.2 decrease to 0.1 increase; moderate certainty). Adjunctive NSAID therapy probably had no impact on the duration of mechanical ventilation (1.6 hr reduction; 95% CI, 0.4 hr to 2.7 reduction; moderate certainty) and may have no impact on ICU length of stay (2.1 hr reduction; 95% CI, 6.1 hr reduction to 2.0 hr increase; low certainty). Variability in reporting adverse outcomes (e.g., gastrointestinal bleeding, acute kidney injury) precluded their meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS:In postoperative critical care adult patients, systemic NSAIDs reduced opioid use and probably reduced pain scores. However, the evidence is uncertain for the duration of mechanical ventilation or ICU length of stay. Further research is required to characterize the prevalence of NSAID-related adverse outcomes.KEY WORDS: intensive care unit; ketorolac; meta-analysis; nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs; opioid O pioids are liberally administered in ICUs as part of analgesic and sedation regimens (1). However, prolonged opioid exposure can lead to patients developing tolerance, physical dependence, and withdrawal if abruptly discontinued (2). These effects may carry over even after discharge