Gauge invariance requires even in the weak interactions that physical, observable particles are described by gauge-invariant composite operators. Such operators have the same structure as those describing bound states, and consequently the physical versions of the W ± , the Z, and the Higgs should have some kind of substructure. To test this consequence, we use lattice gauge theory to study the physical weak vector bosons off-shell, especially their form factor and weak radius, and compare the results to the ones for the elementary particles. We find that the physical particles show substantial deviations from the structure of a point-like particle. At the same time the gaugedependent elementary particles exhibit unphysical behavior.

No abstract

Machine learning methods, such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks can predict real-life time series data. Here, we present a new approach to predict time series data combining interpolation techniques, randomly parameterized LSTM neural networks and measures of signal complexity, which we will refer to as complexity measures throughout this research. First, we interpolate the time series data under study. Next, we predict the time series data using an ensemble of randomly parameterized LSTM neural networks. Finally, we filter the ensemble prediction based on the original data complexity to improve the predictability, i.e., we keep only predictions with a complexity close to that of the training data. We test the proposed approach on five different univariate time series data. We use linear and fractal interpolation to increase the amount of data. We tested five different complexity measures for the ensemble filters for time series data, i.e., the Hurst exponent, Shannon’s entropy, Fisher’s information, SVD entropy, and the spectrum of Lyapunov exponents. Our results show that the interpolated predictions consistently outperformed the non-interpolated ones. The best ensemble predictions always beat a baseline prediction based on a neural network with only a single hidden LSTM, gated recurrent unit (GRU) or simple recurrent neural network (RNN) layer. The complexity filters can reduce the error of a random ensemble prediction by a factor of 10. Further, because we use randomly parameterized neural networks, no hyperparameter tuning is required. We prove this method useful for real-time time series prediction because the optimization of hyperparameters, which is usually very costly and time-intensive, can be circumvented with the presented approach.

Measures of signal complexity, such as the Hurst exponent, the fractal dimension, and the Spectrum of Lyapunov exponents, are used in time series analysis to give estimates on persistency, anti-persistency, fluctuations and predictability of the data under study. They have proven beneficial when doing time series prediction using machine and deep learning and tell what features may be relevant for predicting time-series and establishing complexity features. Further, the performance of machine learning approaches can be improved, taking into account the complexity of the data under study, e.g., adapting the employed algorithm to the inherent long-term memory of the data. In this article, we provide a review of complexity and entropy measures in combination with machine learning approaches. We give a comprehensive review of relevant publications, suggesting the use of fractal or complexity-measure concepts to improve existing machine or deep learning approaches. Additionally, we evaluate applications of these concepts and examine if they can be helpful in predicting and analyzing time series using machine and deep learning. Finally, we give a list of a total of six ways to combine machine learning and measures of signal complexity as found in the literature.