Abstract. Sediment traps with partially open check dams are crucial elements for flood
protection in alpine regions. The trapping of sediment is necessary when
intense sediment transport occurs during floods that may endanger urban areas
at downstream river reaches. In turn, the unwanted permanent trapping of
sediment during small, non-hazardous floods can result in the ecological and
morphological degradation of downstream reaches. This study experimentally
analyses a novel concept for permeable sediment traps. For ensuring the
sediment transfer up to small floods, a guiding channel implemented in the
deposition area of a sediment trap was systematically studied. The bankfull
discharge of the guiding channel corresponds to a dominant morphological
discharge. At the downstream end of the guiding channel, a permeable barrier
(check dam) triggers sediment retention and deposition. The permeable barrier
consists of a bar screen for mechanical deposition control, superposed to a
flow constriction for the hydraulic control. The barrier obstructs hazardous
sediment transport for discharges that are higher than the bankfull discharge
of the guiding channel without the risk of unwanted sediment flushing
(massive self-cleaning).
Riverine fish stranding is of significant concern due to its potentially devastating impacts on fish populations already at risk. Because stranding is dependent on a wide range of biotic and abiotic factors, it is difficult to accurately identify and parameterize fish stranding risks for various river topographies, fish species/lifestages and flow ramping scenarios. This article presents a literature review, new concepts and a novel Python3 algorithm for post‐processing two‐dimensional hydrodynamic numerical model results to identify spatially explicit locations where fish stranding is likely, such as but not limited to downstream of hydropeaking facilities. Compared to previous stranding algorithms, this one is novel in its use of graph theory to find optimal fish escape routes and for its embedding in the free, open‐source river analysis software River Architect. Guided by biological parameter selection and supplied with two‐dimensional hydrodynamic model rasters, River Architect's Stranding Risk module is suitable for characterization of existing pool stranding risks, alternative flow regime and topographic design evaluation and post‐project assessment of rivers during flow recessions.
Sediment traps are crucial elements for flood protection in mountain rivers with high sediment transport capacity. Existing structures often interrupt the channel connectivity. Ideally, a sediment trap should be permeable for bed load during non-hazardous floods and ensure sediment retention during hazardous discharges. A new sediment trap concept, fulfilling these requirements was recently developed and tested in a laboratory flume. A guiding channel trough the deposition area is combined with a slot check dam having an upstream bar screen with bottom clearance. This study aims to validate the proposed concept with a finer sediment mixture on an experimental set-up. Furthermore, we provide improved recommendations for bar screen design regarding minimal bar spacing and the range of applicable clearance heights. Optimal bar spacing and clearance heights of the bar screen are determined through individual tests of the bar screen with steady discharges and varying sediment supply intensity. The best performing bar screen configuration is subsequently tested in combination with a slot check dam using a flood hydrograph to simulate the influence of quasi-unsteady discharge. The proposed concept corresponds to a combined mechanical-hydraulic control and works well for a large range of grain sizes, if the bar screen is correctly adapted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.