Recently, Dean and Lefèvre [Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 198301 (2003)] developed a method for testing the statistical mechanical theory of granular packings proposed by Edwards and co-workers [Physica A 157, 1080 (1989); Phys. Rev. E 58, 4758 (1998)]. The method relies on the prediction that the ratio of two overlapping volume histograms should be exponential in volume. We extend the method by showing that one can also calculate the entropy of the packing and also that the method can yield false positive results when the histograms are Gaussians with nearly identical variances. We then apply the method to simulations and experiments of granular compaction. The distribution of global volumes (the volume of the entire packing) is nearly Gaussian and it is difficult to conclude if the theory is valid. On the other hand, the distribution of Voronoï volumes clearly obeys the theoretical prediction.
We investigate the mechanical behavior of granular suspensions subjected to coupled vibrations and shear. At high shear stress, whatever the mechanical vibration energy and bead size, the system behaves like a homogeneous suspension of hard spheres. At low shear stress, in addition to a dependence on bead size, vibration energy drastically influences the viscosity of the material that can decrease by more than 2 orders of magnitude. All experiments can be rationalized by introducing a hydrodynamical Peclet number defined as the ratio between the lubrication stress induced by vibrations and granular pressure. The behavior of vibrated wet and dry granular materials can then be unified by assimilating the hookean stress in dry media to the lubrication stress in suspensions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.