Since FDG is not specific to infection, the specificity of FDG PET/CT was very low. FDG-labelled leucocyte PET/CT with its high specificity may be a useful method and better than labelled leucocyte scintigraphy in periprosthetic infection imaging.

Abdominal re-approximation anchor system and VAC dressing can be used separately or in conjunction with each other for closure of delayed open abdomen successfully.

Background Unintended perioperative hypothermia, defined as core body temperature less than 36°C, is closely related to many complications such as cardiovascular diseases, peroperative hemorrhagic diathesis and impairment of drug metabolism. Determination of the incidence of perioperative hypothermia and examination of risk factors may help to prevent hypothermia and its complications. Methods We conducted a prospective, observational study of 2015 patients who underwent various operations under general anesthesia, and the risk factors of developing hypothermia were analysed. Results The incidence of perioperative hypothermia was 78.6%. The incidence of hypothermia within 2 hours was 56.6%, and after 2 hours, it was 100%. Mean age was 49.36 ± 16.10, and 17.8% were over 65 years old. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.96 ± 3.94 kg/m2; 60.8% of the patients had American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I score, 33.4% had ASA II and 5.8% had ASA III; 35.8% of the patients had co‐morbidities. Intravenous and irrigation fluids were unwarmed; 99.9% of the patients were warmed passively, and only 0.1% of patients received active heating intraoperatively. The incidence of hypothermia was higher in overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2), elderly (>65 years) patients and those with co‐morbidities. High American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, grade 3‐4 surgery, endoscopic surgery, duration of anesthesia >2 hours, infusion or irrigation >1000 mL significantly increased the incidence of hypothermia. Conclusion The incidence of perioperative hypothermia found was high. Important risk factors were found as prolonged duration of anesthesia and surgery, advanced age, overweight, high ASA scores, major surgeries, endoscopic operations and unwarmed fluid administration. High incidence may be reduced by raising awareness, considering fossible risk factors and following the recommendations of the guidelines on prevention of perioperative hypothermia.

The value of a persistently or progressively increased serum anti-Tg level in the follow-up of DTC in the prediction of recurrence/metastasis is controversial. However, it is reported that FDG-PET can be useful in the detection of recurrence/metastasis. We conclude from the available data that PET/CT can be effectively used in the detection of recurrence/metastasis in the follow-up of patients with DTC and negative serum Tg and a persistently/progressively increased anti-Tg level. Besides, one half of the patients were FDG negative, meaning that further studies are needed to assess the prognostic-clinical value of PET negativity.

It is recommended that endotracheal cuff (ETTc) pressure be between 20 and 30 cm HO. In this present study, we intend to observe average cuff pressure values in our clinic and the change in these values after the training seminar. The cuff pressure values of 200 patients intubated following general anesthesia induction in the operating theatre were measured following intubation. One hundred patients whose values were measured before the training seminar held for all physician assistants, and 100 patients whose values were measured after the training seminar were regarded as Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. Cuff pressures of both groups were recorded, and the difference between them was shown. Moreover, cuff pressure values were explored according to the working period of the physician assistants. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gender and tube diameters. Statistically significant difference was found between cuff pressure values before and after the training (p < 0.001). Average pressure measure for Group I was 54 cm HO, while average pressure in Group II declined to 33 cm HO. It was observed that as the working period and experience of physician assistants increased, cuff pressure values decreased, however no statistically significant different was found (p < 0.375). We believe that clinical experience does not have significant effects on cuff pressure and that training seminars held at intervals would prevent high cuff pressure values and potential complications.