Background The majority of citrate protocols for hemodialysis (HD) use calcium (Ca)-free dialysate, a limited number use dialysate with Ca, aiming to simplify the procedure. This randomized clinical study sought to compare the anticoagulant effect of citrate using Ca-free dialysate and dialysate with Ca 1.25 mmol/L. Methods Fifty HD procedures (in 5 chronic HD patients treated by chronic citrate anticoagulation) were randomly assigned to Ca-free dialysate (25 procedures) or Ca-1.25 dialysate (25 procedures), both with Mg 0.5 mmol/L, Na 138 mmol/L, and bicarbonate 28 mmol/L. Ca-free HD: 15% Na3 citrate 80 ml/hour was infused into the arterial line, and 1 M CaCl2, 14 ml/hour into the venous line. Ca-1.25 group: 15% Na3 citrate 100 ml/hour, 1 M CaCl2 2–4 ml/hour. Polyflux H dialyzers were used. Antithrombotic effect was assessed visually after HD at 3 points: dialyzer, arterial, and venous bubble traps, using a score of 5 (no clotting) to 1 (total clotting). Results Ca-free group: arterial bubble trap score 4.7 ± 0.5, dialyzer 4.5 ± 0.6, venous bubble trap 4.8 ± 0.6. Ionized calcium (iCa) at dialyzer inlet 0.34 ± 0.17, outlet 0.21 ± 0.06 mmol/L. All HDs were completed successfully. Ca-1.25 group: arterial bubble trap score 4.7 ± 0.5 (NS), dialyzer 2.6 ± 1.04 (p<0.01), venous bubble trap 2.4 ± 0.9 (p<0.01). Volume of clot in venous bubble trap was 1.9 ± 1.8 mL (range 0.5–6 mL). iCa at dialyzer inlet 0.24 ± 0.05 mmol/L (p<0.05), outlet 0.63 ± 0.11 mmol/L (p<0.01). Four of 25 HD procedures (16%) were prematurely terminated due to threatening dialyzer clotting, in 6/25 HD procedures (24%), the venous line was changed (p<0.01). Conclusion Citrate anticoagulation with Ca-1.25 dialysate resulted in significantly worse anticoagulation of dialyzer and venous bubble trap compared with Ca-free dialysate, despite higher citrate dose.

No abstract

Abstract:This report provides a summary of the 2011 Slovenian renal replacement therapy (RRT) data. Data were obtained from 24 renal centers: 23 dialysis and one transplant center, referred as of 31 December 2011, with 100% response rate to individual patient questionnaires. Slovenia has a population of approximately 2 million (2 052 496 in 2011). The total number of patients treated by RRT was 2011,that is, 980 per million of population (pmp); 0.4% decrease compared to 2010. 1347 (67.0%) were treated by hemodialysis, 60 (3.0%) by peritoneal dialysis, and 604 (30.0%) had a functioning kidney graft. A total of 236 incident patients, 115 pmp (at day one), started RRT, their median age was 68 years, 64.8% were men, 36.4% were diabetics. Regarding hemodialysis patients, 59.3% were treated with on-line hemodiafiltration, 86% with ultrapure dialysis fluid. Median weekly duration of hemodialysis was 12.5 h, median dry body weight 70 kg, mean blood flow 275 Ϯ 46 mL/min, 7.1% were dialyzed in a single-needle mode. Vascular accesses were native arteriovenous fistula in 79%, polytetrafluoroethylene graft in 6%, and catheter in 15%. The crude death rate was 15.9% in dialysis patients, 1.9% in transplant recipients, and 12.0% in all RRT patients (both dialysis and transplant, incident patients at day 1 included). Slovenia has been a member of Eurotransplant since 2000. Forty-six kidney transplantations were performed in 2011, all from deceased donors. A slight decrease in prevalent number of RRT patients was observed in 2011, for the first time in 40 years. The number and proportion of patients with functioning kidney grafts is increasing, reaching 30% in 2011.

A decrease in kidney GS during the first year after transplantation, as compared with an increase in GS, is a powerful predictor of subsequent graft dysfunction or end-stage graft failure.