Consideration of iron-chelation (IC) in transfusion-dependent patients is recommended in most clinicalpractice guidelines on myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The financial impact of IC on health-care systems is predicted through economic modeling, but an analysis based on actual prevalence is lacking. Here, we have investigated the potential drug-costs and need for IC in a cohort of 189 United Kingdom-based MDS patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2010. Patients with low or intermediate-1 IPSS scores were identified as eligible for IC if 24 red cell units (RCU) had been transfused over 12 consecutive months or the transfusion-intensity averaged 2 RCU per month. Drug-costs were calculated from the time patients qualified for IC until death or last follow-up. In 159 patients with low/intermediate-1 MDS, survival was superior with a low IPSS score (P 5 0.014), age <70 years (P 5 0.043), transfusion-independence at diagnosis (P 5 0.0056) and transfusion-intensity of <2 RCU per month (P 5 0.009). Reflecting the time elapsed since diagnosis, longer survival was observed with a cumulative red cell load of 75 U (P 5 0.046). By logistic-regression analysis, transfusion-intensity independently predicted survival (P 5 0.0035) in low and intermediate-1 risk MDS patients. Forty-one patients fulfilled criteria for consideration of IC. Of these, 6 patients died within 1 month; 35 patients survived for a median of 16 months (range 1-61). Had patients commenced IC, the anticipated drug-costs alone would have been $526,880-$2,064,800 over 10 years. The lack of association between cumulative transfusion-load and survival calls for a prospective evaluation of the cost-utility of IC in patients surviving long-term, to enable evidencebased recommendations in MDS management. Am. J. Hematol. 86:406-410, 2011. V
Introduction: Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) and anaemia of chronic disease (ACD) are common causes of anaemia with similar clinical and laboratory features. IDA is caused by low iron stores while ACD is due to iron-restricted erythropoiesis occurring in inflammatory states. Differential diagnosis requires analysis of multiple biochemical and haematological parameters. IDA can occur simultaneously to ACD (mixed aetiology). It is essential that true iron deficiency is identified, as these patients will require iron therapy. This preliminary study investigated whether hepcidin, the master regulator of iron homeostasis, in conjunction with reticulocyte haemoglobin equivalent (RetHe) has the potential to differentiate IDA from ACD, and to exclude IDA in patients with mixed aetiology.Methods: Hepcidin concentration (measured using a commercially available ELISA method), RetHe, and iron parameters along with C-reactive protein (CRP) were analysed in 77 Gastroenterology patients with anaemia in a secondary care setting.Results: Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that hepcidin at an optimal cut-off concentration of <6ng/ml could identify IDA with a sensitivity and specificity of 88.9% and 90.6% respectively and could distinguish ACD from IDA with both a sensitivity and specificity of 100% at a cut-off of >46ng/ml. Identifying true IDA in mixed aetiology patients could be achieved by RetHe analysis and applying an optimal cut-off of <30pg.
Conclusion:Hepcidin, in conjunction with RetHe, offers a new simplified diagnostic pathway for differential diagnosis of IDA and ACD, thereby reducing the diagnostic turnaround time and allowing appropriate treatment of patients with a true iron deficiency.
This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.