No abstract

No abstract

There have been substantial efforts in using deep learning (DL) to diagnose cancer from digital images of pathology slides. Existing algorithms typically operate by training deep neural networks either specialized in specific cohorts or an aggregate of all cohorts when there are only a few images available for the target cohort. A trade-off between decreasing the number of models and their cancer detection performance was evident in our experiments with The Cancer Genomic Atlas dataset, with the former approach achieving higher performance at the cost of having to acquire large datasets from the cohort of interest. Constructing annotated datasets for individual cohorts is extremely time-consuming, with the acquisition cost of such datasets growing linearly with the number of cohorts. Another issue associated with developing cohort-specific models is the difficulty of maintenance: all cohort-specific models may need to be adjusted when a new DL algorithm is to be used, where training even a single model may require a non-negligible amount of computation, or when more data is added to some cohorts. In resolving the sub-optimal behavior of a universal cancer detection model trained on an aggregate of cohorts, we investigated how cohorts can be grouped to augment a dataset without increasing the number of models linearly with the number of cohorts. This study introduces several metrics which measure the morphological similarities between cohort pairs and demonstrates how the metrics can be used to control the trade-off between performance and the number of models.

No abstract

The identification of abnormal findings manifested in retinal fundus images and diagnosis of ophthalmic diseases are essential to the management of potentially vision-threatening eye conditions. Recently, deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis systems (CADs) have demonstrated their potential to reduce reading time and discrepancy amongst readers. However, the obscure reasoning of deep neural networks (DNNs) has been the leading cause to reluctance in its clinical use as CAD systems. Here, we present a novel architectural and algorithmic design of DNNs to comprehensively identify 15 abnormal retinal findings and diagnose 8 major ophthalmic diseases from macula-centered fundus images with the accuracy comparable to experts. We then define a notion of counterfactual attribution ratio (CAR) which luminates the system’s diagnostic reasoning, representing how each abnormal finding contributed to its diagnostic prediction. By using CAR, we show that both quantitative and qualitative interpretation and interactive adjustment of the CAD result can be achieved. A comparison of the model’s CAR with experts’ finding-disease diagnosis correlation confirms that the proposed model identifies the relationship between findings and diseases similarly as ophthalmologists do.