D onor organ shortages occasionally mandate the use of hepatic allografts from antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) (ϩ) donors. The transplantation of anti-HBc (ϩ) livers carries a 25% to 95% risk of transmitting hepatitis B virus (HBV) to recipients, 1-6 although some of these studies showed lower rates of HBV infection in recipients who are anti-HBc/ anti-HBs (antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen) positive. 2,3,5,6 Several reports have recommended that some forms of prophylaxis should be undertaken to prevent de novo hepatitis B infection in recipients who received a graft from anti-HBc (ϩ) donors. 1,7-9 Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and/or lamivudine have been used for prophylaxis, but their life-long administration presents problems, such as a mutant strain emergence, high cost, and several side effects. Thus, active immunization is a better strategy than HBIG or lamivudine, if it is effective. Reports issued to date on the active immunization of patients waiting for liver transplantation [10][11][12] and who have undergone liver transplantation have not been satisfactory. 13,14 A poor response rate with vaccination and rapid decline in serum hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) titer have been reported. 14 Recently, good results have been reported for the active immunization of selected patients after liver transplantation. 15

Evidence before this study: Acute appendicitis is the most common general surgical emergency in children. Its diagnosis remains challenging and children presenting with acute right iliac fossa (RIF) pain may be admitted for clinical observation or undergo normal appendicectomy (removal of a histologically normal appendix). A search for external validation studies of risk prediction models for acute appendicitis in children was performed on MEDLINE and Web of Science on 12 January 2017 using the search terms ["appendicitis" OR "appendectomy" OR "appendicectomy"] AND ["score" OR "model" OR "nomogram" OR "scoring"]. Studies validating prediction models aimed at differentiating acute appendicitis from all other causes of RIF pain were included. No date restrictions were applied. Validation studies were most commonly performed for the Alvarado, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score (AIRS), and Paediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) models. Most validation studies were based on retrospective, single centre, or small cohorts, and findings regarding model performance were inconsistent. There was no high quality evidence to guide selection of the optimum model and threshold cutoff for identification of low-risk children in the UK and Ireland. Added value of this study: Most children admitted to hospital with RIF pain do not undergo surgery. When children do undergo appendicectomy, removal of a normal appendix (normal appendicectomy) is common, occurring in around 1 in 6 children. The Shera score is able to identify a large low-risk group of children who present with acute RIF pain but do not have acute appendicitis (specificity 44%). This low-risk group has an overall 1 in 30 risk of acute appendicitis and a 1 in 270 risk of perforated appendicitis. The Shera score is unable to achieve a sufficiently high positive predictive value to select a high-risk group who should proceed directly to surgery. Current diagnostic performance of ultrasound is also too poor to select children for surgery. Implications of all the available evidence: Routine pre-operative risk scoring could inform shared decision making by doctors, children, and parents by supporting safe selection of lowrisk patients for ambulatory management, reducing unnecessary admissions and normal appendicectomy. Hospitals should ensure seven-day-a-week availability of ultrasound for medium and high-risk patients. Ultrasound should be performed by operators trained to assess for acute appendicitis in children. For children in whom diagnostic uncertainty remains following ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or low-dose computed tomography (CT) are second-line investigations.

PurposeColonic diverticulitis is an uncommon disease in Korea, but the incidence of the disease is increasing. The right colon is the more preferred site for diverticulitis in Korea, but the incidence of left diverticulitis is increasing. Therefore, comparing the clinical features and treatments for right diverticulitis with those for left diverticulitis may help us to treat the disease more properly.MethodsThis study was performed retrospectively by reviewing the medical records of 96 patients with colonic diverticulitis, in whom either conservative or operative treatments were performed.ResultsEighty-six patients had right diverticulitis (RD), and 10 patients had left diverticulitis (LD). The mean age of the patients was older for LD. Sixteen patients (18.6%) with RD had complications, and 7 patients (8.1%) underwent operations. On the other hand, 4 patients (40%) with LD had complications, and 3 patients (30%) underwent operations. The rates of complications and operations among old-aged patients were higher. The operations for 7 patients with RD who underwent surgery were 6 ileocecectomies and 1 diverticulectomy. On the other hand, the operations for the 3 patients with LD who underwent surgery were 2 resections and anastomoses and 1 diverticulectomy. The reasons for the operations were abscess formation, recurrence, perforation, and development of generalized peritonitis without response to conservative treatment.ConclusionThe incidence of LD is lower than that of RD in Korea, but the rate of complications and operations seems higher in LD. Therefore, patients who complain of left lower abdominal pain need to be thoroughly examined for LD.

The administration of a high dose of apocynin inhibited Nox2 expression and Nox activity, reduced lipid peroxidation, suppressed the NF-κB pathway and subsequent pro-inflammatory cytokines transcription in the lung tissues, and attenuated lung injury during HS and resuscitation in rats.